GDP Growth: According
to Wikipedia's definition Gross Domestic Product is as follows:
A region's gross domestic
product, or GDP, is one of
several measures of the size of its economy. The GDP
of a country is defined as the market value of all final
goods and services produced within a country in a given
period of time. It is also considered the sum of value
added at every stage of production of all final goods
and services produced within a country in a given period
of time. Until the 1980s the term GNP or gross
national product was used in the United States. The two
terms GDP and
GNP are almost identical. The most common approach
to measuring and understanding GDP is the expenditure
method:
- GDP =
consumption +
investment +
government spending + (exports
−
imports)
Please see rear of article for expanded and detailed
information on the formulas. It also shows in great detail the
limitations and the critique of GDP.
According to BEA, National Economic Accounts,
11/29/2006, the GDP is as follows:
Period
% Change from prior period
1st Quarter 2005
3.4%
2nd Quarter 2005
3.3%
3rd Quarter 2005
4.2%
4th Quarter 2005
1.8%
1st Quarter 2006
5.6%
2nd Quarter 2006
2.6%
3rd Quarter 2006
2.2%
For the Year 2007, it is forecast that the GDP growth will
be in the 2-1/2% -3-1/2%. But depending upon actions of the FED and
stubbornly high energy prices this could vary.
Current Economic Conditions: Following
are the results of a Gallup poll regarding the perceptions of economic
conditions in the United Stated.
|
Gallup
Poll. Nov. 9-12, 2006.
N=1,004 adults nationwide. MoE ±
3. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
"How would you rate economic conditions in this country
today -- as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
| |
|
Excellent |
Good |
Only Fair |
Poor |
Unsure |
|
| |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
| |
11/9-12/06 |
8 |
32 |
43 |
16 |
- |
|
| |
10/20-22/06 |
9 |
35 |
33 |
22 |
1 |
|
| |
10/9-12/06 |
7 |
34 |
42 |
16 |
1 |
|
| |
9/7-10/06 |
5 |
29 |
44 |
22 |
1 |
|
| |
8/7-10/06 |
5 |
31 |
43 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
7/6-9/06 |
5 |
33 |
42 |
19 |
1 |
|
| |
6/1-4/06 |
6 |
30 |
46 |
18 |
- |
|
| |
5/8-11/06 |
4 |
25 |
45 |
25 |
- |
|
| |
4/10-13/06 |
5 |
33 |
40 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
3/13-16/06 |
4 |
30 |
45 |
20 |
1 |
|
| |
2/6-9/06 |
4 |
34 |
42 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
1/20-22/06 |
5 |
34 |
41 |
18 |
1 |
|
| |
1/9-12/06 |
8 |
35 |
37 |
18 |
1 |
|
| |
12/19-22/05 |
6 |
33 |
39 |
22 |
- |
|
| |
12/5-8/05 |
6 |
31 |
43 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
11/17-20/05 |
5 |
32 |
39 |
24 |
- |
|
| |
11/7-10/05 |
3 |
29 |
47 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
10/24-26/05 |
3 |
26 |
45 |
25 |
1 |
|
| |
10/13-16/05 |
3 |
25 |
46 |
26 |
- |
|
| |
9/26-28/05 |
3 |
28 |
41 |
27 |
1 |
|
| |
9/12-15/05 |
3 |
28 |
44 |
25 |
- |
|
| |
8/22-25/05 |
4 |
30 |
42 |
24 |
- |
|
| |
8 /8-11/05 |
4 |
32 |
46 |
18 |
- |
|
| |
7/25-28/05 |
4 |
28 |
44 |
23 |
1 |
|
| |
7/7-10/05 |
3 |
33 |
45 |
18 |
1 |
|
| |
6/16-19/05 |
4 |
33 |
40 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
6/6-8/05 |
4 |
31 |
45 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
5/23-26/05 |
3 |
37 |
41 |
19 |
- |
|
| |
5/2-5/05 |
1 |
30 |
44 |
25 |
- |
|
| |
4/18-21/05 |
2 |
29 |
44 |
24 |
1 |
|
| |
4/4-7/05 |
3 |
29 |
49 |
18 |
1 |
|
| |
3/21-23/05 |
2 |
30 |
43 |
24 |
1 |
|
| |
3/7-10/05 |
3 |
32 |
48 |
16 |
1 |
|
| |
2/21-24/05 |
5 |
33 |
42 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
2/7-10/05 |
3 |
37 |
44 |
16 |
- |
|
| |
1/3-5/05 |
3 |
38 |
42 |
17 |
- |
|
| |
12/5-8/04 |
2 |
35 |
43 |
19 |
1 |
|
| |
11/7-10/04 |
3 |
33 |
44 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
10/11-14/04 |
2 |
32 |
44 |
22 |
- |
|
| |
10/9-10/04 |
4 |
31 |
40 |
24 |
1 |
|
| |
9/13-15/04 |
3 |
36 |
39 |
22 |
- |
|
| |
8/9-11/04 |
3 |
36 |
40 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
7/30 - 8/1/04 |
6 |
32 |
39 |
23 |
1 |
|
| |
7/8-11/04 |
5 |
32 |
41 |
21 |
1 |
|
| |
6/3-6/04 |
3 |
32 |
44 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
5/2-4/04 |
2 |
27 |
43 |
27 |
1 |
|
| |
4/5-8/04 |
3 |
31 |
44 |
22 |
- |
|
| |
3/8-11/04 |
2 |
30 |
44 |
24 |
- |
|
| |
2/9-12/04 |
2 |
31 |
46 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
1/12-15/04 |
3 |
34 |
42 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
1/2-5/04 |
3 |
40 |
41 |
16 |
- |
|
| |
12/11-14/03 |
3 |
34 |
44 |
19 |
- |
|
| |
11/3-5/03 |
2 |
28 |
49 |
21 |
- |
|
| |
10/24-26/03 |
2 |
24 |
44 |
30 |
- |
|
| |
10/6-8/03 |
2 |
20 |
50 |
27 |
1 |
|
| |
9/8-10/03 |
1 |
20 |
49 |
30 |
- |
|
| |
8/4-6/03 |
1 |
24 |
52 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
7/7-9/03 |
1 |
23 |
50 |
26 |
- |
|
| |
6/12-15/03 |
1 |
25 |
49 |
25 |
- |
|
| |
5/19-21/03 |
1 |
20 |
47 |
31 |
1 |
|
| |
5/5-7/03 |
1 |
21 |
50 |
28 |
- |
|
| |
4/7-9/03 |
2 |
25 |
51 |
22 |
- |
|
| |
3/29-30/03 |
1 |
25 |
51 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
3/24-25/03 |
3 |
30 |
47 |
20 |
- |
|
| |
3/3-5/03 |
1 |
21 |
46 |
32 |
- |
|
| |
2/17-19/03 |
1 |
17 |
48 |
34 |
- |
|
| |
2/3-6/03 |
2 |
20 |
53 |
25 |
- |
|
| |
1/20-22/03 |
1 |
19 |
49 |
31 |
- |
|
| |
1/13-16/03 |
2 |
20 |
50 |
28 |
- |
|
| |
12/19-22/02 |
1 |
23 |
48 |
28 |
- |
|
| |
12/5-8/02 |
2 |
23 |
51 |
24 |
- |
|
| |
11/22-24/02 |
2 |
30 |
45 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
10/31 - 11/3/02 |
2 |
26 |
45 |
26 |
1 |
|
| |
10/3-6/02 |
2 |
24 |
46 |
27 |
1 |
|
| |
9/23-26/02 |
2 |
25 |
47 |
25 |
1 |
|
| |
9/5-8/02 |
2 |
22 |
53 |
23 |
- |
|
| |
8/19-21/02 |
1 |
23 |
47 |
28 |
1 |
|
| |
8/5-8/02 |
1 |
27 |
52 |
19 |
1 |
|
| |
7/29-31/02 |
2 |
27 |
48 |
22 |
1 |
|
| |
7/22-24/02 |
2 |
25 |
48 |
24 |
1 |
|
| |
7/9-11/02 |
2 |
26 |
51 |
20 |
1 |
|
| |
6/17-19/02 |
2 |
35 |
43 |
19 |
1 |
|
| |
6/3-6/02 |
3 |
33 |
49 |
14 |
1 |
|
| |
5/20-22/02 |
3 |
38 |
46 |
12 |
1 |
|
| |
5/6-9/02 |
2 |
33 |
51 |
14 |
- |
|
| |
4/22-24/02 |
2 |
37 |
46 |
14 |
1 |
|
| |
4/8-11/02 |
2 |
36 |
51 |
11 |
- |
|
| |
3/4-7/02 |
3 |
31 |
51 |
14 |
1 |
|
| |
2/4-6/02 |
2 |
26 |
55 |
16 |
1 |
|
| |
1/7-9/02 |
2 |
27 |
54 |
16 |
1 |
|
| |
12/6-9/01 |
2 |
29 |
53 |
16 |
- |
|
| |
11/8-11/01 |
2 |
29 |
50 |
19 |
- |
|
| |
10/11-14/01 |
2 |
36 |
48 |
13 |
1 |
|
| |
9/14-15/01 |
3 |
43 |
44 |
9 |
1 |
|
| |
9/7-10/01 |
2 |
30 |
49 |
19 |
- |
|
| |
8/16-19/01 |
2 |
34 |
49 |
14 |
1 |
|
| |
7/19-22/01 |
3 |
38 |
47 |
11 |
1 |
|
| |
6/11-17/01 |
3 |
39 |
45 |
12 |
1 |
|
| |
5/10-14/01 |
3 |
37 |
45 |
15 |
- |
|
| |
4/6-8/01 |
4 |
41 |
41 |
14 |
- |
|
| |
3/5-7/01 |
3 |
43 |
43 |
10 |
0 |
|
| |
2/1-4/01 |
7 |
44 |
36 |
13 |
- |
|
| |
1/10-14/01 |
11 |
56 |
27 |
6 |
- |
|
| |
12/2-4/00 |
12 |
51 |
28 |
8 |
1 |
Real
Estate Taxes: Real estate taxes on Long Island are the
highest in the United States. In Nassau County, for example, the school
taxes are about 65% to 70% of the tax dollar. In Nassau, there are 56
districts while in Suffolk there are 68. According to a study on
"Budgets and Taxes" published in Newsday on May 1st, 2006 a complete
summary of the 124 districts, the proposed budgets for 2006-2007 and the
% change over the prior year was published. While there were a
small amount of districts with slightly lower or no change budgets, the
predominance of the districts showed single and double digit growth.
The largest proposed increase was 33.42% in Suffolk and 15.01% in
Nassau. It is forecast that the taxes will again rise in 2007
predominately caused by the school taxes.
Mortgage Interest Rates
The
Fed has raised interest rates successively through most of last year and
part of this year. We
will see what the new FED Chairman has in mind but we forecast that
interest rates won't go up much more. In fact during October and
November mortgage interest rates have been declining. As of
November 22nd, 2006 the 30 year fixed rate was 6.36% down from 6.46% the
prior week. The 15 year fixed rate was 6.06% down from 6.18%. The
1 year ARM was 5.84% up from 5.76%.Mortgage rates should remain at
near lows of late 2006 for at least the next two to three quarters.
This is after having risen most of the first three quarters of 2006.
By
the 4th Quarter, economic activity should prompt the FED to
start to raise interest rates again which will negatively impact
mortgage rates and this should start the rates on the upward cycle going
into middle of 2008.
According to Home Finance of
America, 12/8/2006, the basic mortgage rates are as follows:
30 Year Fixed: 5.750%, APR: 5.89 %
15 Year Fixed: 5.50%, APR 5.60%
It is forecast that the mortgage
interest rates will rise by 20-40 basis points by the end of 2007.
Historically,
as
of December 31, 2005, the 30 year fixed rate mortgage is approximately
6.4%. The 15 year fixed rate mortgage is approximately 5.9% while the 1
year adjustable rate mortgage is approximately 5.75%
Prime Interest Rates
According to Citibank as of
11/30/20006 the prime rate was 8.25%
Historically the prime rate is
as follows:
Prime Rate
Date
-
8.25
July 1st, 2006
-
8.00
May 11th, 2006
-
7.75
March 29th, 2006
-
7.50
February 1st, 2006
-
7.25
December 15th, 2005
-
7.00
November 2nd, 2005
-
6.75
September 21st, 2005
-
6.50
August 10th, 2005
-
6.25
July 1st, 2005
-
6.00
May 4th, 2005
-
5.75
March 23rd, 2005
-
5.50
February 3rd, 2005
-
5.25
December 15th, 2004
-
5.00
November 12th, 2004
-
4.75
September 22nd, 2004
-
4.50
August 12th, 2004
-
4.25
July 2nd, 2004
-
4.00
June 27th, 2003
-
4.25
November 7th, 2002
-
4.75
December 12th, 2001
-
5.00
November 7th, 2001
-
6.75
June 28th, 2001
-
7.00
May 16th, 2001
-
7.50
April 19th, 2001
-
8.00
March 21, 2001
-
8.50
February 1st, 2001
-
9.00
January 4th, 2001
-
9.50
May 17th, 2000
-
9.00
March 24th, 2000
-
8.75
February 2nd, 2000
-
8.50
November 17th, 1999
-
8.25
August 25th, 1999
-
8.00
July 1st, 1999
Bond Interest Rates: Historically,
as
of December 30th, 2005 the yield for the 30 year bond was
4.53% while the yield for the 10 year bond was 4.38% and the yield for
the 5 year was 4.35% and the two year bond was 4.40%.
Acccording to CNN Money.com
as of December 8th, 2006, the interest rates and yields were as follows:
 |
| 2 yr |
99 31/32 |
-4/32 |
4.63 |
+0.06 |
| 5 yr |
100 1/32 |
-6/32 |
4.48 |
+0.04 |
| 10 yr |
100 27/32 |
-9/32 |
4.51 |
+0.03 |
| 30 yr |
98 1/32 |
-11/32 |
4.62 |
+0.02 |
|
Is this the
beginning of the inverted yield curve? There is good reason to believe
so. What will the Fed Chairman do? It remains to be seen but this will
be high on the priority list.
This is an inverted yield curve
on the left. Note that the yield is very high for the short term
maturities and very low for the long term maturities. It should be
just the opposite. A normal yield curve is on the right.

Historically, an inverted yield
curve has been viewed as an indicator of a pending economic recession.
When short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, market sentiment
suggests that the long-term outlook is poor and that the yields offered
by long-term fixed income will continue to fall. More recently, this
viewpoint has been called into question as foreign purchases of
securities issued by the U.S. Treasury have created a high and sustained
level of demand for products backed by U.S. government debt. When
investors are aggressively seeking
debt
instruments, the debtor can offer lower interest rates. When this
occurs, many argue that it is the laws of supply and demand, rather than
impending economic doom and gloom, that enable lenders to attract buyers
without having to pay higher interest rates. There is merit to
this thinking but, if you continue the logical reasoning, could US debt
continue to mound and still have falling interest rates? (To learn more,
see
Forces Behind Interest Rates and
Trying To
Predict Interest Rates.)
Consumer Confidence
The Conference Board reported on December 29th, 2006 that consumer
confidence shot up to an eighth month high of 109.0 in December. This is the first December in three years
where the consumer confidence level went down. RBC financial group
said, "that its monthly measure of U.S. consumer confidence dropped
more than 5 points to 86.9 from 92.4 in November, as consumers expressed
concern about current and future economic conditions, as well as
investing."
It is forecast that consumer confidence will rise to over
115-123 by the end of the year. This will primarily be do to the rebuilding
efforts of the damage of Hurricane Katrina, a solution to the war in
Iraq (exit strategy), rebuilding of the World Trade Center, The
Presidential Elections and continued moderate economic growth.
|
Conference Board CONSUMER CONFIDENCE
INDEX conducted by
TNS (methodology) |
|
. |
| |
|
Consumer
Confidence
Index
(1985=100) |
Present
Situation
Index |
Expectations
Index |
|
|
. |
| |
Nov.
2006 * |
102.9 |
123.6 |
89.2 |
|
| |
Oct.
2006 ** |
105.1 |
125.1 |
91.9 |
|
| |
Sept.
2006 |
105.9 |
128.3 |
91.0 |
|
| |
Aug. 2006 |
100.2 |
123.9 |
84.4 |
|
| |
July 2006 |
107.0 |
134.2 |
88.9 |
|
| |
June
2006 |
105.4 |
132.2 |
87.5 |
|
| |
May
2006 |
104.7 |
134.1 |
85.1 |
|
| |
April
2006 |
109.8 |
136.2 |
92.3 |
|
| |
March
2006 |
107.5 |
133.3 |
90.3 |
|
| |
Feb.
2006 |
102.7 |
130.3 |
84.2 |
|
| |
Jan.
2006 |
106.8 |
128.8 |
92.1 |
|
| |
Dec.
2005 |
103.8 |
120.7 |
92.6 |
|
| |
Nov.
2005 |
98.3 |
113.2 |
88.4 |
|
| |
Oct.
2005 |
85.2 |
107.8 |
70.1 |
|
| |
Sept.
2005 |
87.5 |
110.4 |
72.3 |
|
| |
Aug.
2005 |
105.5 |
123.8 |
93.3 |
|
| |
July
2005 |
103.6 |
119.3 |
93.2 |
|
| |
June 2005 |
106.2 |
120.8 |
96.4 |
|
| |
May
2005 |
103.1 |
117.8 |
93.4 |
|
| |
April
2005 |
97.5 |
113.8 |
86.7 |
|
| |
March
2005 |
103.0 |
117.0 |
93.7 |
|
| |
Feb.
2005 |
104.4 |
116.8 |
96.1 |
|
| |
Jan.
2005 |
105.1 |
112.1 |
100.4 |
|
| |
Dec.
2004 |
102.7 |
105.7 |
100.7 |
|
| |
Nov.
2004 |
92.6 |
96.3 |
90.2 |
|
| |
Oct.
2004 |
92.9 |
94.0 |
92.2 |
|
| |
Sept.
2004 |
96.7 |
95.3 |
97.7 |
|
| |
Aug.
2004 |
98.7 |
100.7 |
97.3 |
|
| |
July
2004 |
105.7 |
106.4 |
105.3 |
|
| |
June
2004 |
102.8 |
105.9 |
100.8 |
|
| |
May
2004 |
93.1 |
90.5 |
94.8 |
|
| |
April
2004 |
93.0 |
90.4 |
94.8 |
|
| |
March
2004 |
88.5 |
84.4 |
91.3 |
|
| |
Feb.
2004 |
88.5 |
83.3 |
91.9 |
|
| |
Jan.
2004 |
97.7 |
86.1 |
105.3 |
|
| |
Dec.
2003 |
94.8 |
76.0 |
107.4 |
|
| |
Nov.
2003 |
92.5 |
81.0 |
100.1 |
|
| |
Oct.
2003 |
81.7 |
67.0 |
91.5 |
|
| |
Sept.
2003 |
77.0 |
59.7 |
88.5 |
|
| |
Aug.
2003 |
81.7 |
62.0 |
94.9 |
|
| |
July
2003 |
77.0 |
63.0 |
86.3 |
|
| |
June
2003 |
83.5 |
64.2 |
96.4 |
|
| |
May
2003 |
83.6 |
67.3 |
94.5 |
|
| |
April
2003 |
81.0 |
75.2 |
84.8 |
|
| |
Mar.
2003 |
61.4 |
61.4 |
61.4 |
|
| |
Feb.
2003 |
64.8 |
63.5 |
65.7 |
|
| |
Jan.
2003 |
78.8 |
75.3 |
81.1 |
|
| |
Dec.
2002 |
80.7 |
69.6 |
88.1 |
|
| |
Nov.
2002 |
84.9 |
78.3 |
89.3 |
|
| |
Oct.
2002 |
79.6 |
77.2 |
81.1 |
|
| |
Sept.
2002 |
93.7 |
88.5 |
97.2 |
|
| |
Aug.
2002 |
94.5 |
93.1 |
95.5 |
|
| |
July
2002 |
97.4 |
99.4 |
96.1 |
|
| |
June
2002 |
106.3 |
104.9 |
107.2 |
|
| |
May
2002 |
110.3 |
111.2 |
109.7 |
|
| |
April
2002 |
108.5 |
106.8 |
109.6 |
|
| |
March
2002 |
110.7 |
111.5 |
110.2 |
|
| |
Feb. 2002 |
95.0 |
96.4 |
94.0 |
|
| |
Jan. 2002 |
97.8 |
98.1 |
97.6 |
|
| |
Dec. 2001 |
94.6 |
97.8 |
92.4 |
|
| |
Nov. 2001 |
84.9 |
96.2 |
77.3 |
|
| |
Oct. 2001 |
85.3 |
107.2 |
70.7 |
|
| |
Sept. 2001 |
97.0 |
125.4 |
78.1 |
|
| |
Aug.
2001 |
114.0 |
144.5 |
93.7 |
|
| |
July 2001 |
116.3 |
151.3 |
92.9 |
|
| |
June 2001 |
118.9 |
156.8 |
93.5 |
|
| |
May 2001 |
116.1 |
159.6 |
87.1 |
|
| |
April 2001 |
109.9 |
156.0 |
79.1 |
|
| |
March 2001 |
116.9 |
167.5 |
83.1 |
|
| |
Feb. 2001 |
109.2 |
167.1 |
70.7 |
|
| |
Jan. 2001 |
115.7 |
170.4 |
79.3 |
|
| |
Dec. 2000 |
128.6 |
176.1 |
96.9 |
|
| |
Nov. 2000 |
132.6 |
179.7 |
101.2 |
|
| |
Oct. 2000 |
135.8 |
176.8 |
108.4 |
|
| |
Sept. 2000 |
142.5 |
182.5 |
115.9 |
|
| |
Aug. 2000 |
140.8 |
181.3 |
113.9 |
|
| |
July 2000 |
143.0 |
186.8 |
113.7 |
|
| |
June 2000 |
139.2 |
180.1 |
111.9 |
|
| |
May 2000 |
144.7 |
183.6 |
118.7 |
|
| |
April 2000 |
137.7 |
179.8 |
109.7 |
|
| |
March 2000 |
137.1 |
182.5 |
106.8 |
|
| |
Feb. 2000 |
140.8 |
180.1 |
114.6 |
|
| |
Jan. 2000 |
144.7 |
183.1 |
119.1 |
Budget
Deficits
According to the White House
Office of Management and Budget, the projected deficit for 2006 will be
-$423.2 billion and for 2007 it will be -$352.2 billion.
Housing:
In a New York Times article heading August 6th, 2006 reports that
inventory is soaring, buyers taking their time and sellers lowering
their sights. Inventory is up across the board. More on this
later. An article earlier on in the year by Newsday, 4/18/2006 headlines
that the housing market pace is slowing.
In New York City it is expected that the condominium market could
fall
by 3%-5% while the cooperative market could rise 10%-15%. This is
caused by the fact that the cooperative prices are extremely low when
compared to the other housing prices and thus the demand has shifted to
them. Additionally, the outer boroughs of Manhattan are also being
positively affected due to the continued increases of rents and housing
prices in Manhattan. However, there is a glut of condominiums on the
market, including the "to be builts" in the pipeline. There are
also substantial New Jersey projects, in excess of 10,000 units
overlooking lower Manhattan with 6 minute train access time, being held
in abeyance.
In Nassau County the median price of houses is forecast to fall by 6%-8%
for the year. The median price of houses in Suffolk County
is expected to fall 4%-6% for the year. In Suffolk, the median
price of houses is expected to stay between 0% and 2% for the year.
As of November 22nd, 2006 the median
prices of houses were as follows: Nassau- $480,000; Suffolk- $402,000;
Queens-$490,000.
In a
Newsday article dated November 11th, 2006, the median home prices in
Nassau and Suffolk houses fell as follows: Nassau $500,000 in October
2005 to $472,300 in November 2006, Suffolk $400,000 October 2005 to
$390,000 in November 2006, Queens $462,800 in October 2005 to $477,900
in November 2006. Additionally the number of homes on the market
increased as follows: Nassau 6,575 October 2005 to 9,769 November 2006,
Suffolk 9,358 October 2005 to 13,923 November 2006, Queens 6,243 October
2006 to 10,047 November 2006.
Interesting facts:
In this
market, setting the right first price is important. If set
correctly, the property will move the quickest. Numerous agents
are working with their sellers and even sharing the cost to bring in an
appraiser to help properly set the price.
Glass
condominiums were the top choice by architects and residents for
residents in Manhattan.
According to a Prudential Douglas Elliman report written by Miller
Samuel, new residential construction is almost entirely condominiums
which have lead to a 60% increase in condo inventory. Co-op
inventory reported is up about 7%. Their Manhattan 3rd Quarter
2006 reports two interesting statistics: The average sales prices is
down 7% from the prior quarter $1,288,748 current quarter, $1,380,193
prior quarter. The average sale price per square foot for the
current quarter is $1,050 while the average sale price per square foot
for the prior quarter is $1,083 down 3%. The number of days of the
market (DOM) from the last date went from 150 days in the current
quarter from 144 days in the prior quarter, up 4.2%. The listing
discount from last date on the market went from 3.5% to 4%.
Additionally the report addressed the cooperative market. " Price
indicators fell from prior quarter records but remained above prior year
levels. The average sale price of a Manhattan Co-op apartment fell
16.1% from the prior quarter to $1,296,452 but was up 13.8% over the
prior year quarter average sale price of $956,490.
The
Miller Samuel report also addresses the mood of the buyers and seller
and says ,,," the sense of urgency is missing, standoff between buyers
and sellers remains."
In the
luxury market, "prices saw greater gains from last year than the overall
market. The average sale price was $4,509,833 down from the prior
quarter near record average selling price of $5,013,147 but was 17.9%
higher than the prior year quarter average sale price of $3,824,079. The
average days on market increased 11 days to 161 days as compared to 150
days in the prior quarter. The average sales price of $1,973,569 are
virtually unchanged from the prior quarter average of $ 1,974,623 but up
26.2% from the prior year quarter average sales price of
$1,563,388. The average number of days it took to sell a loft apartment
was 145 days, 13 days longer than the prior quarter and 29 days longer
than the same period a year ago."
In the
loft market, " prices weakened from the prior quarter but above prior
year quarter. All price indicators fell from the records set in the
prior quarter but remain higher than the same period last year."
There
are various sources reporting the "market weakness" could last 6 months
to a year or so. This is traditionally a slow time in housing
going into the holidays. The statistics in the 2nd quarter will be
more meaningful.
The
assessor in Nassau County is sharply expanding real estate taxes of
owners of illegal multi family housing according to Newsday article
dated October 4th, 2006. A front page article in Newsday earlier dated
October 2nd, 2006 showed an old property tax bill on a sample house like
this of $5,912 going to $33,765. Other houses cited showed a 4 to
5 fold increase in real estate taxes.
According to a Newsday article dated October 20th, 2006, New York City
will build affordable housing on the Queens site that was part of the
Olympics bid. It will be 5,000 units with the average rent being
$1,200 to $2,500 for families in the income range of $60,000 to
$150,000. The construction will begin in 2008. It is noted that this
initiative will be the largest affordable housing project since
Brooklyn's Starrett City opened in the 1970's.
The
most common value enhancing improvements that pay off reported by the
New York Times, November 5th, 2006 are: renovated lobby, playroom, gym,
roof deck, roof replacement, boilers and burners, elevators, full time
doormen.
The use
of Feng Shui is growing more popular in real estate decorating
decisions. What is feng shui exactly. It is phonetically
pronounced as "fung schway". It is a methodolgy of the alignment
of living spaces to maximize "chi" or living energy. It also
maximized the flow and balance of natural energy. It uses a
special compass called a "lou pan" or an octagonal map called a " bagua".
Along with either one of these, depending upon the practicioner,
numerology and astrology also come into play. Real estate experts
report that it makes the house more marketable, however no known studies
have been known to be done along with appropriate peer review.
The
latest home price figures as reported by the Multiple Listing Service of
Long Island are as follows:
QUEENS
November 2005
$455,000
October 2006
$477,900
November 2006
$505,000
NASSAU
November 2005
$490,000
October 2006
$472,300
November 2006
$485,000
SUFFOLK
November 2005
$390,000
October 2006
$390,000
November 2006
$395,000
Below
are the historical median sales prices of homes for Nassau, Suffolk and
Queens Counties.
Year Median %change Number
of % change from
Sale From
Listings Previous Year
Price
Previous Year
Nassau
County
2005 $490,000 12.64
28,507 18.59
2004 435,000 12.99
24,038 17.90
2003 385,000 6.94
20,388 31.25
2002 360,000 19.60
15,534 -4.02
2001 301,000 20.40
16,184 12.83
2000 250,000
14,344
Suffolk
County
2005 $390,000 8.03
38,535 20.73
2004 361,000 13.34
31,918 14.81
2003 318,500 15.82
27,800 26.24
2002 275,000 19.57
22,021 2.82
2001 230,000 21.31
21,418 3.92
2000 189,600
20,611
Queens
County
2005 $455,000 18.18
27,109 27.12
2004 385,000 15.10
21,325 12.51
2003 334,500 15.74
18,954 39.31
2002 289,000 25.65
13,606 4.43
2001 230,000 15.87
13,029 -4.01
2000 198,500
13,573
Source: Long Island Board of Realtors
As
stated earlier, The housing market has shown signs of cooling off but by
no means a burst of a bubble, at least, not as of this writing.
According to Associated Press, 11/20/2006, the National Association of
Realtors said sales of existing homes fell in 38 States and the prices
of homes slid in 45 Metropolitan areas. According to the Census
Bureau, housing starts plunged nearly 15% to a seasonally adjusted
annual rate of 1.49 million in October 2006 from a revised 1.74 million
in September 2006.
For
an historical perspective, new
home construction slowed in October 2005 with an annualized construction
rate of about 2.2 million homes which was a fall of 5.6 % the largest
decline in almost six years. The National Association has an index
called the Housing Market Index, which is their way of looking at the
statistics. In October is fell about 6 points to 60 which is mid point
for their index. This “slowdown” is interpreted by many as simply a
return to “normal” growth.
The
housing market is estimated to be just beginning to approach the point
where "normal" supply and demand relationships will prevail. This normal
supply and demand balance is expected to occur late in 2008. Normal
supply and demand is defined as:
1. A small amount of marketing time or days on market
(DOM) about 3-6 months for the mainstream house.
2. A 5% -10% difference (lower) between asking price and
ultimate selling price.
As
the market gets there, it will go through a phenomenon. Very little
inventory ( which has been the case over the last year or two)
proceeding to a seeming flood of inventory of houses for sale during the
winter months, leading to a reasonable balance late in the 4th quarter
of 2008 which will lead to the stimulus of the start of new
construction. This is the basic description of a "market cycle".
In
this process there will be some market disintermediation at the upper to
extreme upper-end of the housing spectrum. Given the juxtaposition to
New York City ( the financial and cultural capital of the world) and the
overall strong world economy, the housing market in general, as measured
by the median sales price, will finish the year 2007 slightly behind than the
beginning of the year with low single digit percentage declines in Nassau
( -5% to -10%),
Suffolk ( -6% to -11%) , and Queens ( -3% to -5%). The condominium
market in New York City is forecast to decline ( -10% to -15%).
Some
of my esteemed colleagues in the industry have published detailed
housing reports for New York City and boroughs. Many go through
each neighborhood reciting current prices for both condominiums and
cooperatives, historical prices and other information. To access
those reports, the web site contact information is listed in the
rear of this forecast.
Office
Rents: $41.75 to
$53.50 ( not including the extreme upper end i.e penthouses etc.) per s/f effective rent Class A Manhattan with higher rents
probable in the new buildings with spikes for penthouse spaces, $29.50
- $33.00 per s/f effective rent Class
A
on Long Island. But there has been developing shadow office space a/k/a
sublease space.
It has been coming on the market in significant quantities over the last
year. The market has been reasonably strong but office vacancies have
been reported to increase in the last quarter of 2006.
New office construction doesn't
make economic sense unless rents are greater than $30.00 per square
foot on Long Island and $50.00 plus in Manhattan. At the present time there are four significant projects underway
and all report doing well on Long Island. Most notably the
Times Square office section is doing very well.
Overall office vacancy rates in both Nassau
and Suffolk County are expected to increase slightly. In Nassau is
could rise to 8.0% while in Suffolk is could rise to 11.25%.
Office vacancy overall in Manhattan is forecast to be in the 7% to 8%
range for the upper level space in the mid-town market. The
downtown market is forecast to be in the 9% range for the high end
space.
Of note, Manhattan
office buildings have been selling for over $1,000 per square foot.
Just recently reported by Newsday, 11/28/2006, The Towers, a 150,000
square foot building at 111 Great Neck Road sold last months to Philips
International for $52.5 Million or $350 per square foot. It also
reported the following: EAB Plaza now Reckson Plaza sold just under $250
per square foot last year and the Computer Associates headquarters sold
for $263 per square foot.
From an historical perspective the office markets in both New York City
and Long Island are about at the same point in the economic cycle.
There is little speculative building. In New York City there was a lot
of space being taken by start up companies financed by venture
capitalists. Since venture capital money is typically short term or
about 2 years, what happens is these companies don't perform well and
the venture capital money is called. Should the international business
influx continue into New York City, this also will continue the economic
picture positively.
Since
the first beams of the World Trade Center have just been installed (
12/19/2006 amid the speeches and ceremonies) the statistics of the
World Trade Center loss will be summarized. Added to that will be
the World's Tallest Buildings so that a comparison between the New World
Trade Center, a building you have in mind and the world's tallest
buildings can be examined and compared.
World Trade Center Attack Statistics
On
September 11th, 2001, two domestic hijacked planes crashed
into both of the World Trade Center Towers eventually destroying both
along with much collateral damage.
As
reported by the New York Times, September 23, 2001 a list of the
directly and perimeter damaged buildings.
World
Trade Center Building Destroyed
Gross Square Feet
1 World Trade
Center
4,761,416
2 World Trade
Center
4,761,416
7 World Trade
Center
2,000,000
5 World Trade
Center
783,520
4 World Trade
Center
576,000
6 World Trade
Center
537,694
World Trade Center
Total
13,420,046
Perimeter Office
Buildings Damaged
Gross Square Feet
2 World Financial
Center
2,591,244
3 World Financial
Center
2,263,855
1 Liberty
Plaza
2,121,437
4 World Financial
Center
2,083,555
1 World Financial
Center
1,461,365
1 Bankers Trust
Plaza
1,415,086
140 West
Street
1,171,540
90 Church
Street
950,000
195
Broadway
875,000
22 Cortlandt
Street
668,110
30 West
Broadway
381,090
130 Cedar
Street
135,000
114 Liberty
Street
69,004
26 Cortlandt
Street
25,000
106 Liberty
Street
18,000
110 Liberty
Street
6,000
Perimeter
Total
16,585,286
Overall
Total
30,005,332
COMPELLING ECONOMIC
IMPLICATIONS
With the World Trade Center
and related buildings being out of action since 9/11/2001 a look at the
compelling economic implications is given for economic perspective. Assuming a
office market rent of $40 per square foot, there is a total loss of rent of
$536,801,840 ( does not include the damaged buildings)
not to mention the multiplier effect of employment. Assume one person for
every 150 square feet and an average salary of $50,000 the economic amount lost
to this area is $4,473,348,667.
World's Tallest Buildings
According to
AboutArchitecture.com following is a list of the world's tallest buildings
including the World Trade Center. Building listed in shaded boxes are
proposed.
|
World's Tallest Buildings Ranked
Buildings in shaded boxes are proposed, not completed,
or no longer standing. For completed buildings, scroll down.
|
Building & Location |
Year |
Sto-
ries |
Height |
Chief
Architect
|
|
M. |
Ft.
|
Burj Dubai ,
Dubai, UAE
(under construction) |
2008? |
160 |
800 |
|
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill |
|
Center of India Tower, Katangi, India
(speculative) |
2008? |
224
|
677
|
2,222 |
|
Tower of Russia, Moscow, Russia
(proposed)
|
2010? |
134 |
648 |
2,129 |
|
|
International Business Center, Seoul, S. Korea
(proposed) |
2008? |
130 |
580 |
1,903 |
|
Lotte World II
Busan S. Korea
(proposed) |
2012? |
107 |
512 |
1,680 |
Steven Huh, ParkerDurrant International |
Taipei 101 Tower
Taipei, Taiwan
|
2004 |
101 |
509 |
1,670 |
C.Y. Lee & Partner |
Shanghai World Financial Center, China
(under construction) |
2007? |
101
|
492
|
1,614 |
Kohn Pederson Fox |
|
Union Square Phase 7, Hong Kong, China (under
construction) |
2007? |
102 |
474 |
1,555 |
|
Suyong Bay Tower, Busan, S. Korea
(proposed)
|
2010? |
102 |
462 |
1,516 |
Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates |
Xujiahui Tower, Shanghai, China
(proposed) |
|
92 |
460 |
1,509 |
|
|
Petronas Tower 1, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
1998 |
88 |
452 |
1,483
|
|
|
Petronas Twin Tower 2, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
1998 |
88 |
452 |
1,483
|
|
The Gateway III, Hong Kong, China
(proposed)
|
? |
|
450 |
1,476 |
|
|
Sears Tower, Chicago |
1974 |
110 |
442 |
1,450
|
|
Asia Plaza, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
(proposed) |
2008? |
103 |
431 |
1,414 |
TMA Architects & Associates |
|
Jin Mao Building, Shanghai |
1999 |
88 |
421 |
1,381
|
|
|
Dalian International Trade Center, Dalian China
(proposed) |
2007? |
78 |
420 |
1,378
|
|
Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center
New York
(under construction) |
2011? |
|
417 |
1,368
(1,776
with
spire) |
Daniel Libeskind / Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
|
World Trade Center, New York
Destroyed by terrorists 9/11/01 |
1973 |
110 |
417 |
1,368
|
|
|
Two International Finance Centre (IFC), Hong Kong |
2003 |
88 |
415 |
|
|
|
Sky Central Plaza (CITI Plaza, China International
Trust) Guanzhou |
1997
|
80
|
391
|
1,283
|
DLN Architects
|
|
North Bund Tower, Shanghai, China (proposed)
|
? |
72 |
388 |
1,273 |
John Portman & Associates |
|
|
1996
|
69
|
384
|
1,260
|
K.Y. Cheung Design Assc.
|
|
Empire State Building, New York |
1931 |
102 |
381 |
1,250
|
Shreve, Lamb and Harmon
|
Abbco Rotana Hotel, Dubai, UAE (proposed)
|
2006 |
72 |
380 |
1,247 |
Khatib & Alami |
|
Central Plaza, Hong Kong |
1992 |
78 |
374 |
1,227 |
Ng Chun Man
|
|
Bank of China Tower, Hong Kong |
1989 |
70 |
369 |
1,209 |
|
|
Bank of America Tower, New York City USA (under
construction) |
2008? |
54 |
366 |
1,200 |
Cook+Fox
|
Millenium Tower Frankfurt Germany
(proposed) |
2011? |
91 |
365 |
1,198 |
Albert Speer & Partner GmbH |
|
Emirates Tower One, Dubai |
1999 |
54 |
355 |
1,165 |
|
|
T & C Tower (Tuntex Sky Tower), Kaoshiung, Taiwan |
1997 |
85 |
348 |
1,140 |
|
|
Aon Centre, Chicago |
1973 |
80 |
346 |
1,136 |
|
|
The Center, Hong Kong |
1998 |
79 |
346 |
1,135 |
Ng Chun Man
|
|
John Hancock Center, Chicago |
1969 |
100 |
344 |
1,127 |
|
|
Shimao International Plaza, Shanghai, China |
2005 |
60 |
333 |
1,093 |
East China Architecture and Design Institute |
|
Wuhan International Securities Building, Wuhan |
2005 |
68 |
331 |
1,087 |
|
|
Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang, N. Korea |
1995 |
105 |
330 |
1,083 |
|
|
Shanghai 2. Q1 Gold Coast, Australia |
2005 |
79 |
322 |
1,058 |
|
|
Burj al Arab Hotel, Dubai |
1998 |
60 |
321 |
1,053 |
|
|
Chrysler Building, New York |
1930 |
77 |
319 |
1,046 |
William Van Alen
|
|
Bank of America, Atlanta |
1993 |
55 |
312 |
1,023 |
|
|
U.S. Bank Tower, Los Angeles |
1990 |
75 |
310 |
1,018 |
|
|
Menara Telekom Headquarters, Kuala Lumpur |
1999 |
55 |
310 |
1,017 |
|
|
Emerates Tower Two, Dubai |
1999 |
56 |
309 |
1,114 |
|
|
AT&T Corporate Center, Chicago |
1989 |
60 |
307 |
1,007 |
|
|
JP Morgan Chase Tower, Houston |
1982 |
75 |
305 |
1,000 |
|
|
Baiyoke Tower II, Bangkok |
1997 |
85 |
304 |
997 |
|
|
Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago |
1990 |
64 |
303 |
995 |
|
|
Kingdom Centre, Riyadh |
2002 |
41 |
302 |
992 |
|
|
Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang, N. Korea |
1995 |
105 |
300 |
984 |
|
|
First Canadian Place, Toronto |
1975 |
72 |
298 |
978 |
|
Wells Fargo Plaza,
Houston |
1983 |
71 |
296 |
972 |
|
|
Landmark Tower, Yokohama, Japan |
1993 |
70 |
296 |
971 |
|
|
311 South Wacker Drive, Chicago |
1990 |
65 |
293 |
961 |
|
|
SEG Plaza, Shenzhen |
2000 |
71 |
292 |
957 |
|
|
American International Building, New York |
1932 |
67 |
290 |
952 |
|
|
Key Tower, Cleveland |
1991 |
57 |
289 |
947 |
Cesar Pelli |
|
Plaza 66, Shanghai |
2001 |
66 |
288 |
945 |
|
|
One Liberty Place, Philadelphia |
1987 |
61 |
288 |
945 |
|
|
Bank of America Center, Seattle |
1985 |
76 |
285 |
937 |
|
|
Sunjoy Tomorrow Square, Shanghai |
2003 |
55 |
285 |
934 |
|
|
Cheung Kong Center, Hong Kong |
1999 |
63 |
283 |
929 |
|
|
Chongqing World Trade Center, Chongqing |
2005 |
60 |
283 |
929 |
|
|
The Trump Building, New York |
1930 |
72 |
283 |
927 |
|
|
Bank of America Plaza, Dallas |
1985 |
72 |
281 |
921 |
|
|
Overseas Union Bank Centre, Singapore |
1986 |
66 |
280 |
919 |
|
United Overseas Bank Plaza,
Singapore |
1992 |
66 |
280 |
919 |
|
|
Republic Plaza, Singapore |
1995 |
66 |
280 |
919 |
|
|
Citicorp Center, New York |
1977 |
59 |
279 |
915 |
|
|
Hong Kong New World Tower, Shanghai |
2002 |
61 |
278 |
913 |
|
|
Scotia Plaza, Toronto |
1989 |
68 |
275 |
902 |
|
|
Williams Tower, Houston |
1983 |
64 |
275 |
901 |
|
|
Renaissance Tower, Dallas |
1975 |
56 |
270 |
886 |
|
|
Dapeng International Plaza, Guangzhou |
2004 |
56 |
269 |
883 |
|
|
21st Century Tower, Dubai |
2003 |
55 |
269 |
883 |
|
|
900 North Michigan Ave., Chicago |
1989 |
66 |
265 |
871 |
|
|
Bank of America Corporate Center, Charlotte |
1992 |
60 |
265 |
871 |
|
|
SunTrust Plaza, Atlanta |
1992 |
60 |
265 |
871 |
|
|
Triumph Palace, Moscow |
2004 |
61 |
264 |
866 |
|
|
Shenzhen Special Zone Daily Tower, Shenzhen |
1998 |
42 |
264 |
866 |
|
|
Tower Palace Three, Tower G, Seoul |
2004 |
73 |
264 |
865 |
|
|
Trump World Tower, New York |
2001 |
72 |
262 |
861 |
|
|
Grand Gateway: Office Tower One, Shanghai, China |
2005 |
55 |
262 |
859 |
|
|
Water Tower Place, Chicago |
1976 |
74 |
262 |
859 |
|
|
Aon Center, Los Angeles |
1974 |
62 |
262 |
858 |
|
|
BCE Place–Canada Trust Tower, Toronto |
1990 |
51 |
261 |
856 |
|
|
Transamerica Corporate Headquarters, San Francisco |
1972 |
48 |
260 |
853 |
|
|
Commerzbank Tower, Frankfurt |
1997 |
56 |
259 |
850 |
|
|
G.E. Building, New York |
1933 |
70 |
259 |
850 |
|
|
Bank One Plaza, Chicago |
1969 |
60 |
259 |
850 |
|
|
Two Liberty Place, Philadelphia |
1990 |
58 |
258 |
848 |
|
|
Philippine Bank of Communications, Makati |
2000 |
55 |
258 |
848 |
|
|
Park Tower, Chicago |
2000 |
67 |
257 |
844 |
|
|
Messeturm, Frankfurt |
1990 |
63 |
257 |
843 |
|
|
Sorrento 1, Hong Kong |
2003 |
75 |
256 |
841 |
|
|
U.S. Steel Tower, Pittsburgh |
1970 |
64 |
256 |
841 |
|
|
Mok-dong Hyperion Tower A, Seoul |
2003 |
69 |
256 |
840 |
|
|
Rinku Gate Tower, Osaka |
1996 |
56 |
256 |
840 |
|
|
The Harbourside, Hong Kong |
2003 |
74 |
255 |
837 |
|
|
Langham Place Office Tower, Hong Kong |
2004 |
59 |
255 |
837 |
|
|
Capital Tower, Singapore |
2000 |
52 |
254 |
833 |
|
|
Highcliff, Hong Kong |
2003 |
73 |
253 |
831 |
|
|
World Trade Center, Osaka |
1995 |
55 |
252 |
827 |
|
|
Bank of Shanghai Headquarters, Shanghai |
2005 |
46 |
252 |
827 |
|
|
Jiali Plaza, Wuhan |
1997 |
61 |
251 |
824 |
|
|
Rialto Towers, Melbourne |
1986 |
63 |
251 |
824 |
Gerard de Preu / Perrott Lyon Mathieson |
|
One Atlantic Center, Atlanta |
1988 |
50 |
250 |
820 |
|
|
Chelsea Tower, Dubai |
2005 |
49 |
250 |
820 |
|
|
Wisma 46,Jakarta |
1995 |
46 |
250 |
820 |
|
|
Korea Life Insurance Company, Seoul |
1985 |
60 |
249 |
817 |
|
|
CitySpire, New York |
1989 |
75 |
248 |
814 |
|
|
One Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York |
1961 |
60 |
248 |
813 |
|
|
State Tower, Bangkok |
2001 |
68 |
247 |
811 |
|
|
Bank One Tower, Indianapolis |
1989 |
48 |
247 |
811 |
|
|
Condé Nast Building, New York |
1999 |
48 |
247 |
809 |
|
|
MetLife, New York |
1963 |
59 |
246 |
808 |
|
|
Bloomberg Tower, New York |
2004 |
55 |
246 |
806 |
|
|
JR Central Towers, Nagoya |
2000 |
51 |
245 |
804 |
|
|
Shin Kong Life Tower, Taipei, Taiwan |
1993 |
51 |
244 |
801 |
|
|
Malayan Bank, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
1988 |
50 |
244 |
799 |
|
|
Tokyo City Hall, Tokyo |
1991 |
48 |
243 |
797 |
|
|
Woolworth Building, New York |
1913 |
57 |
241 |
792 |
|
|
Mellon Bank Center, Philadelphia |
1991 |
54 |
241 |
792 |
|
|
John Hancock Tower, Boston |
1976 |
60 |
240 |
788 |
|
|
Deutsche Bank Place: 126 Phillip Street, Sydney,
Australia |
2005 |
39 |
240 |
787 |
|
|
Bank One Center, Dallas |
1987 |
60 |
240 |
787 |
|
|
Commerce Court West, Toronto |
1973 |
57 |
239 |
784 |
|
|
Moscow State University, Moscow |
1953 |
26 |
239 |
784 |
|
|
Empire Tower, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
1994 |
62 |
238 |
781 |
|
|
NationsBank Center, Houston |
1984 |
56 |
238 |
780 |
|
|
Roppongi Hills Mori Tower , Tokyo, Japan |
2003 |
54 |
238 |
|
|
|
Bank of America Center, San Francisco |
1969 |
52 |
237 |
779 |
|
|
Worldwide Plaza, New York |
1989 |
47 |
237 |
778 |
|
|
One Canada Square, London |
1991 |
50 |
237 |
777 |
|
|
IDS Center, Minneapolis |
1973 |
52 |
236 |
775 |
|
|
U.S. Bank Place, Minneapolis |
1992 |
58 |
236 |
774 |
|
|
Norwest Center, Minneapolis |
1988 |
57 |
235 |
773 |
|
|
Treasury Building, Singapore |
1986 |
52 |
235 |
770 |
|
One Ninety One Peachtree
Tower, Atlanta |
1991 |
50 |
235 |
770 |
|
|
Opera City Tower, Tokyo |
1997 |
54 |
234 |
768 |
|
|
Shinjuku Park Tower, Tokyo |
1994 |
52 |
233 |
764 |
|
|
Heritage Plaza, Houston |
1987 |
52 |
232 |
762 |
|
|
Suzhou Xindi Center, Suzhou, China |
2005 |
54 |
232 |
761 |
|
Kompleks Tun Abdul Razak
Building, Penang, Malaysia |
1985 |
65 |
232 |
760 |
|
|
The Arch, Hong Kong, China |
2005 |
65 |
231 |
758 |
|
|
Palace of Culture and Science, Warsaw |
1955 |
42 |
231 |
758 |
|
|
Carnegie Hall Tower, New York |
1991 |
60 |
231 |
757 |
|
|
Three First National Plaza, Chicago |
1981 |
57 |
230 |
753 |
|
|
Equitable Tower, New York |
1986 |
51 |
229 |
752 |
|
|
MLC Centre, Sydney |
1978 |
65 |
229 |
751 |
|
|
One Penn Plaza, New York |
1972 |
57 |
229 |
750 |
|
|
1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York |
1972 |
54 |
229 |
750 |
|
|
Prudential Center, Boston |
1964 |
52 |
229 |
750 |
|
|
Two California Plaza, Los Angeles |
1992 |
52 |
229 |
750 |
|
|
Gas Company Tower, Los Angeles |
1991 |
54 |
228 |
749 |
|
Two Pacific Place/Shangri-La
Hotel, Hong Kong |
1991 |
56 |
228 |
748 |
|
|
1100 Louisiana Building, Houston |
1980 |
55 |
228 |
748 |
|
|
Korea World Trade Center, Seoul |
1988 |
54 |
228 |
748 |
|
|
Governor Phillip Tower, Sydney |
1993 |
64 |
227 |
745 |
|
Industrial Rents:
$4.75 - $6.05 Net in Brooklyn &
Queens
$5.60 - $6.80 Net on Long Island
$9.90 - $11.25 Net on Long Island for new
flex space
Retail Rents: $60.00-$65.00 triple net + in the major malls on Long Island
$25.00 - $35.00 prime power centers on Long
Island
$600.00 -$625.00 + in Manhattan in the prime
retail areas i.e. 5th and Madison Avenues, 57th
Street. Areas such as Tribecca, SoHo, the Village and Union Square will
show double digit rates of growth. Chelsea should approach double
digit growth for the quality locations. The downtown area will show modest
gains but will be poised to show double digit gains as the World Trade
Center and related buildings become completed and online. This is
estimated to be three years away.
All other areas a 3%-4% increases.
Interesting fact: Regarding "Black Friday", the
day after Thanksgiving, traditionally the first day of shopping for the
Christmas season, the following was reported by Newsday: 137 Million
shoppers expected across the US, 47.1% of consumers will shop on line (
up from 36% three years ago ) and $457.4 Billion in sales ( up
from 5% from last year)
Capitalization Rates:
Industrial 9.750% - 12.00%
Office 7.75% - 10.5
Retail 7.50% - 10.75%
Hotel 8.75% - 10.75%
Assisted Living
9.00% - 11.00%
Multi-Family
7.25% - 10.00%
Property Appreciation Rates:
Retail 1%-1-1/2%
Office 1%-2%
Industrial
2% -4%
Multi-family 2%-3%
Hotel 2%-4%
Assisted Living
1% - 2%
Stock
Market: As of
December 8th, 2006 according to CnnMoney.com the market statistics
were as follows:
| Dow Jones Industrial
Average
|
|
| 12,313.90 |
+35.49 / +0.29%
Dec 8 11:44am ET †
|
| 12,271.28 |
| 12,332.88 |
| 12,258.54 |
| 14.90% |
| 88,062,793.00 |
| 12,278.41 |
| 10,661.15 -
12,361.00 |
|
Put in perspective at that
time, the rest of the market indices were as follows:
CLOSE OF YEAR MARKET
STATISTICS: The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the year 2006 at
12,463.15 up 16% which was the best performance since 2000.
The market will
probably have volatile but upward growth starting in the 1st
Quarter. The market could hit a low of 11,500 in the Dow Jones
Industrial Average but it is forecast to hit 13,150 by the end of the
year . Due to pronounced demographic shifts, the market could
reach 20,000 by 2009. Ironically the Dow started 2003 at 10,450. As of
the December 30th, it was 10,783. The low for the year
2005 was
10,000.46 and the high was 10,984.46. The NASDAQ as of December 30th,
2005 was 2,205.96. The S&P was up 14% for
the year. It is forecast that the S&P will increase 8%-10% for
2007. The Nasdaq was up 9.5% for the year. It is
forecast that the Nasdaq will increase 5% for 2007. The
Russell was up 17% for the year. It is forecast that the
Russell will rise 12%-15% for the year.
Historical
Snapshots of Dow Jones Industrial Averages
Black Monday (1987)

Complete History of the Down
Jones Industrial Average through December 4th, 2006

The NASDAQ and other parts of the market as of December 8th, 2006
are:
Closing milestones of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is a summary of the closing milestones of the
Dow Jones Industrial Average, the best-known
stock market index in the world. Since opening at 40.94 on
May
26,
1896, the
Dow Jones Industrial Average has grown impressively with
several relatively brief periods of decline.
Milestone Highs and Lows
Like most other stock market indices, the Dow undergoes
periods of general increase and general declines or stagnation.
A
bull market is a term denoting a period of price
increases, while a
bear market denotes a period of declines.
Wall Street generally considers a bear market in session
when the main stock market index is more than 20 percent below
its all-time high. For the Dow in late
2006,
that level is approximately 9,875 points.
There are two types of bull markets. A secular bull market
is a period in which the stock market index is continually
reaching all-time highs with only brief periods of
correction, as during the
1990s,
and can last upwards of 15 years. A cyclical bull market
is a period in which the stock market index is reaching 52-week
or multi-year highs and may briefly peak at all-time highs
before a rapid decline, as in the
early
1970s.
It usually occurs within relatively longer bear markets and
lasts about three years.
The following are the secular bull and bear markets
experienced by the Dow since its inception:
-
1896 –
1929: Bull market. In the summer of 1896 the Dow sheds
30% to set an all-time low of 28.48, but quickly erases its
losses, and eventually grows to a closing high of 381.17 (theoretical
intra-day high of 386.1) on
September 3,
1929.
-
1930 –
1948: Bear market. The
stock market crash of 1929 precedes the
Great Depression. The Dow plunges to 41.22 (theoretical
intra-day low of 40.56) on
July 8,
1932, thus erasing 36 years of gains. From here, the
index would take 22 years to surpass its previous highs.
-
1949 –
1966: Bull market. The Dow posts impressive growth in
the booming economy following the
Second World War . Starting from about 150 in June 1949,
when
P/E ratios reach multi-decade lows, the index ends just
five points below 1,000 on
February 9,
1966.
-
1967 –
1982: Bear market. Traders deal with a stagnant economy
in an inflationary monetary environment. The Dow enters two
long downturns in
1970 and
1974; during the latter, it falls nearly 45% to the
bottom of a 20-year range. The index approaches the 1,000
milestone at the top of its range three times in
1972,
1976 and
1981, but fails to break the mark decisively.
-
1982 –
2000: Bull market. The Dow experiences its most
spectacular rise in history. From a meager 777 on
August 12,
1982, the index grows more than 1,500% to 11,722.98
(actual and theoretical intra-day highs of 11,750.28 and
11,908.50) by
January 14,
2000.
-
2000 - undetermined: Bear market. The Dow struggles with
the 10,000 - 11,000 range for a year and then deteriorates
into a
panic atmosphere of severe declines punctuated by brief
and violent rallies. The index hits a closing low of
7,286.27 (actual and theoretical intra-day lows of 7,197.49
and 7,181.47 the following day), 38% below its highs, on
October 9,
2002. The records of
early
2000 stood until the fourth quarter of
2006.
On
October 3, 2006, the Dow achieved new record closing and
intra-day highs for the first time in nearly seven years. Later
that month, the index closed above 12,000 for the first time (October
19), and stayed above the milestone to set record weekly (October
27) and monthly (October
31) closing levels. While some experts might consider
concurrent record highs in the near future on the DJIA and the
Dow Jones Transportation Average as
Dow Theory confirmation that the bear market ended in 2002,
the depressed state of the technology market compared with 2000
may leave that a matter of dispute. It is notable, however, that
both the tech-laden
NASDAQ Composite and the broader
S&P 500, while not yet at all-time highs, both achieved
six-year monthly closing highs concurrently with the DJIA on
November 30, 2006.
Incremental Closing
Milestones
The following is a list of the milestone closing levels of
the Dow Jones Industrial Average, in 100-point increments.
The first bull market (1896-1929)
The post-World War II boom
(1949-1966)
1This was the Dow's close at the peak of
the 1929 bull market, a level that the Dow would not see again
for 25 years.
The 1970s bear market (1967-1982)
The 1980s bull market (1982-1987)
| Milestone |
Closing Level |
Date |
| 1100 |
1,121.81 |
February 24,
1983 |
| 1200 |
1,209.46 |
April 26, 1983 |
| 1300 |
1,304.88 |
May 20,
1985 |
| 1400 |
1,403.44 |
November 6, 1985 |
| 1500 |
1,511.70 |
December 11, 1985 |
| 1600 |
1,600.69 |
February 6,
1986 |
| 1700 |
1,713.99 |
February 27, 1986 |
| 1800 |
1,804.24 |
March 20, 1986 |
| 1900 |
1,903.54 |
July 1, 1986 |
| 2000 |
2,002.25 |
January 8,
1987 |
| 2100 |
2,102.50 |
January 19, 1987 |
| 2200 |
2,201.49 |
February 5, 1987 |
| 2300 |
2,333.52 |
March 20, 1987 |
| 2400 |
2,405.54 |
April 6, 1987 |
| 2500 |
2,510.04 |
July 17, 1987 |
| 2600 |
2,635.84 |
August 10, 1987 |
| 2700 |
2,700.57 |
August 17, 1987 |
The 1990s Superbull (1990-2000)
| Milestone |
Closing Level |
Date |
| 2800 |
2,810.15 |
January 2,
1990 |
| 2900 |
2,900.97 |
June 1, 1990 |
| 3000 |
3,004.46 |
April 17,
1991 |
| 3100 |
3,101.52 |
December 27, 1991 |
| 3200 |
3,201.48 |
January 3,
1992 |
| 3300 |
3,306.13 |
April 14, 1992 |
| 3400 |
3,413.21 |
June 1, 1992 |
| 3500 |
3,500.03 |
May 19,
1993 |
| 3600 |
3,604.86 |
August 18, 1993 |
| 3700 |
3,710.77 |
November 16, 1993 |
| 3800 |
3,803.88 |
January 6,
1994 |
| 3900 |
3,914.48 |
January 21, 1994 |
| 4000 |
4,003.33 |
February 23,
1995 |
| 4100 |
4,138.67 |
March 24, 1995 |
| 4200 |
4,201.61 |
April 4, 1995 |
| 4300 |
4,303.98 |
April 24, 1995 |
| 4400 |
4,404.62 |
May 10, 1995 |
| 4500 |
4,510.69 |
June 16, 1995 |
| 4600 |
4,615.23 |
July 5, 1995 |
| 4700 |
4,702.73 |
July 7, 1995 |
| 4800 |
4,801.80 |
September 14, 1995 |
| 4900 |
4,922.75 |
November 15, 1995 |
| 5000 |
5,023.55 |
November 21, 1995 |
| 5100 |
5,105.56 |
November 29, 1995 |
| 5200 |
5,216.47 |
December 13, 1995 |
| 5300 |
5,304.98 |
January 29,
1996 |
| 5400 |
5,405.06 |
February 1, 1996 |
| 5500 |
5,539.45 |
February 8, 1996 |
| 5600 |
5,600.15 |
February 12, 1996 |
| 5700 |
5,748.82 |
May 20, 1996 |
| 5800 |
5,838.52 |
September 13, 1996 |
| 5900 |
5,904.90 |
October 1, 1996 |
| 6000 |
6,010.00 |
October 14, 1996 |
| 6100 |
6,177.71 |
November 6, 1996 |
| 6200 |
6,206.04 |
November 7, 1996 |
| 6300 |
6,313.00 |
November 14, 1996 |
| 6400 |
6,430.02 |
November 20, 1996 |
| 6500 |
6,547.79 |
November 25, 1996 |
| 6600 |
6,600.66 |
January 7,
1997 |
| 6700 |
6,703.09 |
January 10, 1997 |
| 6800 |
6,833.10 |
January 17, 1997 |
| 6900 |
6,961.63 |
February 12, 1997 |
| 7000 |
7,022.44 |
February 13, 1997 |
| 7100 & 7200 |
7,214.49 |
May 5, 1997 |
| 7300 |
7,333.55 |
May 15, 1997 |
| 7400 |
7,435.78 |
June 6, 1997 |
| 7500 |
7,539.27 |
June 10, 1997 |
| 7600 & 7700 |
7,711.47 |
June 12, 1997 |
| 7800 |
7,895.81 |
July 3, 1997 |
| 7900 |
7,962.31 |
July 8, 1997 |
| 8000 |
8,038.88 |
July 16, 1997 |
| 8100 |
8,116.93 |
July 24, 1997 |
| 8200 |
8,254.89 |
July 30, 1997 |
| 8300 |
8,314.55 |
February 11,
1998 |
| 8400 |
8,451.06 |
February 18, 1998 |
| 8500 |
8,545.72 |
February 27, 1998 |
| 8600 |
8,643.12 |
March 10, 1998 |
| 8700 |
8,718.85 |
March 16, 1998 |
| 8800 |
8,803.05 |
March 19, 1998 |
| 8900 |
8,906.43 |
March 20, 1998 |
| 9000 |
9,033.23 |
April 6, 1998 |
| 9100 |
9,110.02 |
April 14, 1998 |
| 9200 |
9,211.84 |
May 13, 1998 |
| 9300 |
9,328.19 |
July 16, 1998 |
| 9400 & 9500 |
9,544.87 |
January 6,
1999 |
| 9600 |
9,643.37 |
January 8, 1999 |
| 9700 |
9,736.08 |
March 8, 1999 |
| 9800 |
9,897.44 |
March 11, 1999 |
| 9900 |
9,958.77 |
March 15, 1999 |
| 10000 |
10,006.78 |
March 29, 1999 |
| 10100 |
10,197.70 |
April 8, 1999 |
| 10200 & 10300 |
10,339.51 |
April 12, 1999 |
| 10400 |
10,411.66 |
April 14, 1999 |
| 10500 |
10,581.42 |
April 21, 1999 |
| 10600 & 10700 |
10,727.18 |
April 22, 1999 |
| 10800 |
10,831.71 |
April 27, 1999 |
| 10900 & 11000 |
11,014.70 |
May 3, 1999 |
| 11100 |
11,107.19 |
May 13, 1999 |
| 11200 |
11,200.98 |
July 12, 1999 |
| 11300 |
11,326.04 |
August 25, 1999 |
| 11400 |
11,405.76 |
December 23, 1999 |
| 11500 |
11,522.56 |
January 7,
2000 |
| 11600 & 11700 |
11,722.98 |
January 14, 2000 |
The 2000s
dot-com bust aftermath (2002-Present)
| Milestone |
Closing Level |
Date |
| 11722.98 |
11,727.34 |
October 3,
2006 |
| 11800 |
11,850.61 |
October 4, 2006 |
| 11900 |
11,947.70 |
October 12, 2006 |
| 12000 |
12,011.73 |
October 19, 2006 |
| 12100 |
12,116.91 |
October 23, 2006 |
| 12200 |
12,218.01 |
November 14, 2006 |
| 12300 |
12,305.82 |
November 16, 2006 |

Record Highs
HOW TO COMPUTE THE DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL
AVERAGE
Calculation
To calculate the DJIA, the sum of the prices of all 30 stocks
is divided by a "divisor", which is published on the Chicago
Board of Trade's website
[1]. The divisor is adjusted in case of splits, spinoffs or
similar structural changes, to ensure that such events do not in
themselves alter the numerical value of the DJIA. The initial
divisor was the number of component companies, so that the DJIA
was at first a simple arithmetic average; the present divisor,
after many adjustments, is less than one (meaning the index is
actually larger than the sum of the prices of the component
prices). That is:
-
where p are the prices of the component stocks and
d is the Dow Divisor.
Events like stock splits or changes in the list of the
companies composing the index alter the sum of the prices of the
component prices. In these cases, in order to avoid
discontinuity in the index, the Dow divisor is updated so that
the quotations right before and after the event coincide:
-
COMPANIES THE MAKE UP THE DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE
The Dow Jones Industrial Average consists of the
following 30 companies:
Weights
Because the DJIA is an average of stock prices, it is more
strongly affected by relative changes in performance of
high-priced stocks than by lower-priced ones. For example, a
100% price increase of a $1 stock would have the same effect on
the index as a 1% price increase of a $100 stock, even if both
companies had the same market capitalization. In this sense
higher-priced stocks have a greater "weight" in the index. A
list of the effective weight of each component is published
daily
[2] by Dow Jones, (although the weights change whenever the
prices of the component stocks change). The weights are simply
proportional to the stock prices, and are not used in
calculating the DJIA.
Entertainment
Movies on demand will continue to grow substantially over the next
decade. It will cut into the “movie theatre” business. This will have
a negative impact on the movie theatre business over the next decade.
The movie industry by in large had an excellent year according to box
office revenues.
Energy
Policy
Historical perspective: For a
number of years and even now the United States energy prices were
substantially lower than the rest of the industrialized world. For
that reason, many businesses and industries sprouted up based upon a
"false sense of energy prices".
As of July 12th, 2006, gasoline
prices reported were
Yesterday: $3.25
Day Before: $3.25
Week Ago: $2.43
Record High: 9/11/2005: $3.34
FYI - According to Associates
for International Research, Inc. ( www.air-inc.com), Reuter:
International Energy, when gas prices were $3.20 in the United States
here were the prices from key cities and countries worldwide:
-
Canada
$3.42
-
Mexico
$2.28
-
Britain
$6.70
-
France
$7.22
-
Caracas
$0.12
-
Oslo
$6.90
-
Germany
$6.50
-
Italy
$6.25
-
Israel
$5.28
-
Egypt
$0.65
-
Kenya
$4.37
-
Johannesburg
$3.39
-
Kuwait
$0.78
-
Saudi Arabia
$0.61
-
New Delhi
$3.71
-
Beijing
$2.05
-
Russia
$2.50
-
Japan
$4.50
-
Shanghai
$1.94
-
Sydney
$3.42
Historical gas
spikes - a look at the past- in inflation adjusted prices
-
1973- $ 1.90 -
Arab Oil Embargo - President Nixon-Ford
-
1979 - $3.25 -
Shah of Iran Crisis - President Carter
-
1986 - $1.75-
Opec Oil Price War - President Regan
-
1990 - $2.00 -
Iraq invasion of Kuwait - President Bush # 1
-
2001 - $1.25 -
9/11 attack
In
every one of the last 10 years of real estate economic forecasts, it has
been emphatically stated that the US should devise and implement a
policy to get the economy completely off of fossil fuel ( gasoline and
natural gas ) within a 10 year time frame.
Fossil fuel is a finite resource, meaning it is going to run out at
some point in time based upon how much is actually in the ground
available to be pumped out and the rate at which it is consumed.
It
is again recommended that hydrogen become the replacement for fossil
fuel and a policy to do that should be implemented immediately with
joint cooperation between government and the best minds in business,
science and industry.
Alternative sources such as active and passive energy for new housing
construction, wind and certain hydroelectric possibilities should also
be factored into the equation. In 10 years, it will make an enormous
difference if the United States did enact a wide sweeping new energy
policy incorporating hydrogen power as its main stay. It will also make
an enormous difference if the United States doesn’t implement a new and
wide sweeping energy policy. If the US does implement such a plan it
will have substantial and far reaching positive economic and other
benefits. Having a plan can produce benefits in two ways: 1. Businesses
plan their policies, new product development around their perceptions of
current and forecast energy costs. This promotes greater efficiencies.
2. Having a cohesive energy plan will promote energy savings, conserve
resources and promote new energy producing initiatives . If not, it will
have detrimental effects.
Fossil fuel is going to run out. The only question is when. The
question is what will the predominant energy source of US be when this
happens. If the US has zero dependency on it, that would be ideal. Any
type of dependency would present a problem.
Energy - Significant
points
A new wave theory of producing
energy has been proffered by a few sources, notably Oregon State
University ( Newsday 8/27/2005 ). The process utilized a series of
buoys which harness the motion of the ocean's waves to produce
electricity which is then delivered via an electric cable.
ENVIRONMENT
Governor Eliot Spitzer of New
York will take the oath of office in January. In Newsday's "Albany
Agenda", they report key projects and issues that he and the legislature
will have to work out together in order to move forward. They are
: Greenhouse gases, DEC staffing, Brownsfields - following up on the
State's 2003 landmark law to get contaminated sites cleaned up,
Environmental Protection Funds, Open space and Oceans policy.
All of these have a profound
economic and environmental quality of life effects. The items
listed above don't include additional protection for wetlands. While the
Governor-elect clearly has the will, the big question is " will he find
the way?"
According to Newsday, 12/13/2006
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has painted a portrait of how New
York City will look in 2030, the challenges that lie ahead and a plan to
address them. He reduced the city's challenges to the least common
denominators - " By 2030, nearly 1 million more people will live in the
city, the infrastructure will be about a century old and the water
supply and the air and land will be pushed to extremes." In the montage
behind the mayor's speaking podium, some of the key points read, "
Improve travel, ensure all New Yorkers have parks, develop water network
back up systems, achieve state of good repair on our transportation,
upgrade our energy infrastructure."
Global
Competitiveness
The United States ( US ) has
dropped from #1 to #6 according to the Global Competitiveness Report
released September 26, 2006. In 2005, US was viewed as the most
competitive country in the world. But according to the World
Economic Forum, US has fallen to #6 behind such countries such as
Singapore, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Additionally, US fell to #
5 from # 1 in a Global Technology Readiness Assessment.
There are nine pillars ( used by
World Economic Forum ) critical to driving productivity and
competitiveness according to the report.
Immediately after World War II,
the US has substantial advantages over most of the world:
-
It was undamaged physically
by the war
-
Most all of the creative
structure and infrastructure was on US soil and could be immediately
deployed into civilian output
-
It was the largest economy
in the world- a world superpower
-
It had an endless supply of
capital
-
There was no effective
competition
-
Ease of developing and bring
cutting edge medical and technology products to market
-
Strong trade balance
The report indicates that while
the business competitive component of this sector is stellar, the areas
losing ground are public ( military efforts )and private indebtedness,
lack of personal savings, declining business transparency, declining
educational performance and growing trade imbalance.
The report goes on to report
that US decline in certain major industries such as Ford, GM showing
major declines and losing their foothold to Toyota and Honda.
The report also reports that
Wall Street, the IPO capital, is losing ground to Shanghai as the launch
point for new IPO's.
Additionally the report
highlights that the building trades, developers, owners, managers have
become static with respect to global competitiveness, technology and
innovation. Although real estate is a "local" market attributes
such as the type of real estate product designes, built, operated is
continually being subject to international comparison.
Terms such as NextGen buildings,
paperless real estate operations are considered "too futuristic" here in
the US but have become mainstream around the world.
The entire report can be found
at this web address:
http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness%20Report/index.htm
The World Economic Forum's home
page can be found at this address:
http://www.weforum.org/en/index.htm
Transportation -
Noteworthy points
On Long Island, we basically
have two choices, road and rail. For the rail component, there is
nothing really new except the idea of having a third line added to the
main line as well as the LIRR being extended to the east side. This is a
map of the location.
Following are key excerpts and
references from the website of the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority and the Long Island Railroad.
EAST SIDE ACCESS PROJECT
According to the Long Island
Rail Road (LIRR) web site, the project ( Metropolitan Transportation
Authority MTA known as “ East Side Access”, started construction in
1998. It would connect the
Port Washington branch and the Main lines of the LIRR to the
station via
Sunnyside Yard in Queens and cross the East River on the lower level
of the
63rd Street Tunnel, which is currently served on the upper level by
the
F train of the
New York City Subway.
The project cost has jumped
in price from US$3 billion in 1998 to US$6.3 billion in 2006, with the
biggest and most expensive work yet to be done—tunneling through
Manhattan 90 feet (30 m) below the current
Metro-North Railroad tracks under
Park Avenue, 175 feet (50 m) below the street surface.
There would be no connections
between the two sets of tracks. The LIRR concourse would be under
Vanderbilt Avenue to the west of Grand Central Terminal. Current plans
are to bring 24 trains per hour at peak time to the station (Penn
Station currently can handle a maximum of 42 trains an hour at peak).
Information on the LIRR web
site goes on to say that the project has so far not run into substantial
opposition although some Midtown East businesses have started raising
concerns. In addition,
Cardinal Edward Egan has expressed concerns about the impact of a
proposed air vent (disguised as a building) at 50th Street and Madison
Avenue, very near to
St. Patrick's Cathedral.
The project was justified by
a 1998 study that showed that approximately 70% of all jobs in
Midtown Manhattan are within walking distance of Grand Central,
while only 36% of jobs are within walking distance of Penn Station
(there is some overlap, and some jobs are not within walking distance of
either facility).
If the project is completed,
Metro-North is considering bringing trains into Penn Station via the
West Side Line along Manhattan's west side, which currently handles
Amtrak and freight service.
The current MTA Chairman has indicated that his ultimate goals would be
for the beginning of the east side assess and the merger of the LIRR and
Metro-North. His apparent rational is that LIRR and Metro-North
have many similarities and that "There must be some new efficiencies we
can find." Metro-North enjoys two apparent advantages: 1. it has
exclusive access to Grand Central Terminal while the LIRR faces
bottlenecks going into a crammed Penn Station with New Jersey Transit
and Amtrak. 2. Metro-North has three main lines are unlike LIRR in
that LIRR's main lines, except for 1, have to filter through Jamaica.
In addition to this plan, a
proposal is on the table to build a new tunnel in the
East River to bring LIRR trains downtown to the new
World Trade Center Transportation Hub. This plan is on the drawing
board and construction has not started.
On the road side, nothing of
significance except seemingly endless repairs. There
is an idea being developed. That idea is that on the busiest
highways, paying a price to avoid traffic. In other words, tolls.
The Air Train - The train to the
plane, an Air Train from LIRR's Jamaica Station to Kennedy
Airport- Source: LIRR web site
Routes and Stations

According to the Long Island Rail
Road web site, the AirTrain connects the airport
terminals and parking areas with
Long Island Rail Road and
New York City Subway lines at
Jamaica and
Howard Beach stations in
Queens. The system consists of three overlapping
routes:
- Howard Beach route
- Jamaica Station route
- Airline Terminal route
The Howard Beach route ends at the
Howard Beach-JFK subway station served by the
A train. It stops
at Lefferts Boulevard for shuttle buses to long term
parking lots A and B and to airport employee parking.
The Jamaica route ends at
Jamaica Station on the
Long Island Rail Road, next to the
Sutphin Boulevard/Archer Avenue-JFK subway station
served by the
E,
J, and
Z trains.
Before separating for their final
destinations, both routes stop at Federal Circle for car
rental companies and shuttle buses to hotels and the
airport's air cargo area. Both routes make a
counterclockwise loop through the airport and stop at
each terminal.
The Airline Terminal route serves
the six terminal stations (Terminal 1, Terminals 2/3,
Terminal 4, Terminals 5/6, Terminal 7, and Terminals
8/9), but operates in the opposite direction, making a
clockwise loop.
History
Arriving
at Federal Circle at JFK
Airport.
Two car
AirTrain at Federal Circle.