The 2007 Annual Real Estate Market Forecast ©®™

With Detail

 by Howard Jackson, MAI 

Dated: January 2nd, 2007

 

                                                                                                 

Although the information in this report has been obtained from sources that Integrated Real Estate Services, Inc. believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy, and such information may be incomplete or condensed.  All opinions and estimates included in this report constitute our judgment as of this date and are subject to change without notice.  This report is for information purposes directed to the real estate professional only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any type of real property interest.


 

Introduction and Historical Perspective

 Based upon comments and suggestions of readers like you of our past real estate market forecasts, this forecast will be different from the ones in the past for it will also include questions from readers of the forecast like you.  The questions selected are:

  1. What are the three major economic diseases that could impact the economy and thus the real estate market?

  2. The brain drain on Long Island.  We buy a house on Long Island, raise and educate our children including college.  When they finish and want to have a house of their own, they can’t.  The prices are astronomical.  As a result, they move off Long Island.  Thus our pool of talented workers is not replenished.  Instead, other areas of the country are benefiting.  What is the story here?

  3. What will the impact of China be on the US economy and the World economy during 2007?

  4. Was the War in Iraq the best move?

  5. Should we re-institute the draft?

  6. I have a fixed income property, net net net.  Meaning I get a net check every year for the next 20 years.  The rate of return at the time I bought it was 6%.  Because of actions of the FED over the last 1-1/2 years, the rate is now 8%.  If I tried to sell it (all other things equal), what would it be worth more or less than when I paid for it and why?

Given substantial changes in key aspects of the market, this forecast will contain substantially more detail that the "summary" forecast over the past years.  This is done so that the reader is re-acquainted with key facts, definitions in order to have a clear understanding.  Additionally, entire indices have been presented, for example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average so that the reader can get a complete historical perspective. This index, among others, is presented in both tabular and graphic format. It will also explain "why" certain things are happening in the market.

The September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center caused direct and collateral damage, the extent of which has been quantified to a major extent.  The reconstruction of the World Trade Center and the ancillary buildings are in the process of being built. As of 12/13/2006 the first of two while columns of the Freedom Tower ( having signatures of those effected or related parties ) at ground zero.  The 1st steel piece is 30 feet tall, weighs over 25 tons.  This will be the first of 27 to be installed by May 2007. The security implications of the effects of terrorism have been incorporated into our daily lives.  The situation in Iraq has finally been admitted to by the Administration as an action taken from “faulty” intelligence. Where the country goes militarily in 2007 will have a profound effect on the economy.  It will be assumed that the status quo will be in effect for the immediate and foreseeable term. This means that the recently articulated " goals" by the administration will be to develop the Iraq army so that it can stand on its own without US aid.  This is being done concurrently with the newly elected Iraq administration to mature in office, continuing to be a more effective government without violence and ultimately become autonomous without US help.

 We have had  a new Fed Chairman for a while now.  It is expected that he will continue the path of “price stability” but the tendency will be to hold rates steady, rather than raise interest rates as was done throughout most of 2005 and part of 2006. In fact, Bloomberg News, 12/13/2006 reports that " the Federal Reserve kept the benchmark U.S. interest rate at 5.25%."

 The housing market has shown signs of cooling off but by no means a burst of a bubble, at least, not as of this writing. According to Associated Press, 11/20/2006, the National Association of Realtors said sales of existing homes fell in 38 States and the prices of homes slid in 45 Metropolitan areas.  According to the Census Bureau, housing starts plunged nearly 15% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.49 million in October 2006 from a revised 1.74 million in September 2006. If the housing "bubble" were to burst there would be a few warning signs.  The initial signs of that would be one of a slowing, cooling off.  This would also be consistent with a normal, market correction. These would be the signs to look for:  1. The amount of time that a house stays on the market before being sold (marketing time or days on market DOM) rises. This would be compared to the same period last year and last quarter to get an effective trend.  2. There would be an increasing difference between the "asking" price and the ultimate "selling" price.  At the height of the market, the 'selling" price was sometimes even higher then the asking price.  When the market begins to soften or worse collapse, the differential gets larger; the selling price is less than the asking price and 3. Finally prices begin to fall. This has been happening throughout  the year.  This would be a normal market correction. A "bursting of the bubble" would be substantially more pronounced and continue for a long period of time. More on this subject later.

 As for long and short term interest rates, there appears to be the beginning of an inverted yield curve (please see Bond Interest Rates).  An inverted yield curve is the phenomenon where short term interest rates are higher than long term interest rates.  Normally, the opposite is the case, which makes perfect sense. When an inverted yield curve occurs, most of the time a recession follows.  You should be hearing a lot about this from the stock pundits on television and radio.

Historically, the Stock market in 2003 was about 10,450.  Throughout December 2005 it was about 10,650 - 10,750.   Equity appreciation in the stock market was not the place to be prior to 2006. With Year 2006 that was going to change.  With historically low interest rates and a less than appealing stock market, no wonder real estate had a few banner years prior to 2006. The stock market as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 16% for the year.  The S&P was up 14% and the Nasdaq was up 9.5%  

 Real estate taxes continue to be an issue on Long Island.  They have continued to rise.  People’s first reaction is to blame the assessor.  However, the assessor’s role is to “allocate” the tax burden based upon the Fair Market Value of the properties in the assessor’s jurisdiction.  Real estate taxes are set by the operating budget of the County, Town and School.  School taxes are a major issue and unless that is gotten under control, real estate taxes will continue to rise. Increased State aid would be beneficial.  Unfunded mandates contribute to this.  To reiterate, County Executive Thomas Suozzi, in his inauguration  speech in 2006  has made addressing the issue (reducing) school taxes a top priority in his administration.  He indicated that it is a substantial drain and burden on the majority of the people of Nassau. His plan is based around "fixing Albany" which imposes unfunded mandates which immediately cause tax increases, getting more school aid and looking more into how the school budget itself could be reduced. On the whole these budgets have continued to rise, decade over decade well in excess of the rate of inflation.

  

2007 REAL ESTATE  MARKET FORECAST- In Detail

 Best InvestmentsReal Estate, except for housing,  and very select stocks will outperform all other competitive investments however the fundamentals and the attention to present value must not be ignored of any type of property or stock. This is the first time in the 19 years of forecasting that I haven't recommended housing as a best investment.

                                                                        

LEI                           LEI (Leading Economic Indicators) According to Investorwords.com, the definition of leading economic indicators is as follows.  An economic indicator that changes before the economy has changed. Examples of leading indicators include production workweek, building permits, unemployment insurance claims, money supply, inventory changes, and stock prices. The Fed watches many of these indicators as it decides what to do about interest rates. There are also coincident indicators, which change about the same time as the overall economy, and lagging indicators, which change after the overall economy, but these are of minimal use as predictive tools.


 On 12/6/2006 according to Associated Press, figures released by the Conference Board indicated that leading economic indicators (LEI) rose 0.2% last month.  The index stood @138.3 versus 139.1 in January 2006.  This index is designed to forecast economic activity 3-6 months ahead.  This result suggests that economic growth is moderating.  The index has been down four of the last 7 months.  John Lonski, chief economist of Moody's Investor's Services said, " Economic weakness skewed toward housing and motor vehicles."  The LEI reading suggests the kind of slow growth we are experiencing now could continue through the winter and into the spring. The LEI (leading economic indicators) will rise slowly  for the first quarter of 2007 and then plateau or rise considerably  for the remainder of the 4th  Quarter 2007. 

                                    To balance out this aspect of economic description, the counter part of this is called "lagging economic indicators".  Investorwords.com defines this as follows:  An economic indicator that changes after the overall economy has changed; examples include labor costs, business spending, the unemployment rate, the prime rate, outstanding bank loans, and inventory book value

  

  

UnemploymentFor the most of 2006 unemployment rates continued to rise slightly.  The World Trade Center attack played a negative role as well as corporate layoffs and major corporate scandals such as Arthur Andersen, Enron etc.  This also effected investor confidence which in part can influence unemployment. But for the Year 2007, this is now a known, quantified series of events.  Business planning can make effective use of this knowledge which will chip away at unemployment.  On 12/8/2006, CnnMoney.com reports that employers added 132,000 jobs to payroll in November 2006, according to the Labor Department which was up from a revised gain of 79,000 jobs in October 2006.  The unemployment rate rose to 4.5% from 4.4% in October 2006.  The retail sector added 20,000 jobs in November 2006.

                                    Unemployment for the year 2007 is forecast as follows: New York City 8.36 %, Long Island 4.6%. Levels will drop by December 2007, particularly as the World Trade Center rebuilding get underway. Historically, the US Department of Labor reports Long Island Unemployment at 4.5% for June, 5.1% for July, 4.5% for August, 5.0 for September, 4.5% for November and 5.1% for November 2005.

                              

The historical unemployment rate for Long Island is:

1991                           5.6%

1992                           7.7%

1993                           6.7%

1994                           6.2%

1995                           5.1%

1996                           4.6%

1997                           3.8%  

1998                           3.5%

1999                           3.4%

2000                           2.8%

2001                           3.7%, Queens 5.8%, NYC 6,8

2002                           5.6% estimated.

 Long Island and New York City should outperform the Northeast due to it diverse and international economies.

 

Noteworthy points:

Concerning jobs and employment, the biggest issues were:

  1. The largest companies are locating more jobs off the island.

  2. Some reasons for the off island migration of jobs are - the high cost of living, focus on skilled workers.

  3. Unable to satisfy high level employment needs on the island so off island solutions are being implemented.

According to the State Labor Department  the job creation on Longs Island is:

  1. 1996 - 8,000

  2. 1997 - 19,900

  3. 1998 - 27,400

  4. 1999 - 41,800

  5. 2000 - 27,800

  6. 2001 - 600

  7. 2002 - (-3,100)

  8. 2003 - 7,300

  9. 2004- 11,100

  10. 2005 - 6,700

The job breakdown by sectors are as follows: ( it may not equal 100% due to rounding ).

  1. Government                                 16.5%

  2. Education/Health                        16.4%

  3. Professional/Business                12.7%

  4. Leisure/Hospitality                        7.2%

  5. Manufacturing                                7.1%

  6. Financial                                        6.6%

  7. Construction                                   5.1%

  8. Other                                                6.6%

  9. Information                                     2.4%

  10. Retail,Trade,Transport                 21.7%   

The brain drain.  Talent being raised and educated on Long Island.  Then this talent goes outside of Long Island to live and work.  This cycle deprives Long Island of the necessary rejuvenation and re-supply of talent to continue moving the economy forward.  This is called the brain drain.  Please see the later section of this forecast in the "questions" section.

 Inflation:                   Given the reasonably strong  economy ,  low current inflation, stable but much higher energy prices, stabilized interest rates by the FED ( after almost a year of rate hikes) look for inflation in  1.15% to 2.2 % for the year. ( This will be given substantial coverage later in the article in conjunction with one of the questions posed by our reading audience. )

 

GDP Growth:   According to Wikipedia's definition Gross Domestic Product is as follows:

A region's gross domestic product, or GDP, is one of several measures of the size of its economy. The GDP of a country is defined as the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. It is also considered the sum of value added at every stage of production of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. Until the 1980s the term GNP or gross national product was used in the United States. The two terms GDP and GNP are almost identical. The most common approach to measuring and understanding GDP is the expenditure method:
GDP = consumption + investment + government spending + (exports imports)

Please see rear of article for expanded and detailed information on the formulas. It also shows in great detail the limitations and the critique of GDP.

According to BEA, National Economic Accounts, 11/29/2006, the GDP is as follows:

Period                            % Change from prior period       

1st Quarter 2005                        3.4%

2nd Quarter 2005                        3.3%

3rd Quarter 2005                        4.2%

4th Quarter 2005                        1.8%

1st Quarter 2006                        5.6%

2nd Quarter 2006                        2.6%

3rd Quarter 2006                        2.2%  

For the Year 2007,  it is forecast that the GDP growth will be in the 2-1/2% -3-1/2%. But  depending upon actions of the FED and stubbornly high energy prices this could vary.

 

Current Economic Conditions:  Following are the results of a Gallup poll regarding the perceptions of economic conditions in the United Stated.

Gallup Poll. Nov. 9-12, 2006. N=1,004 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.

             

.

"How would you rate economic conditions in this country today -- as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?"

             

.

    Excellent Good Only Fair Poor Unsure  
    % % % % %  
  11/9-12/06 8 32 43 16 -  
  10/20-22/06 9 35 33 22 1  
  10/9-12/06 7 34 42 16 1  
  9/7-10/06 5 29 44 22 1  
 

8/7-10/06

5 31 43 21 -  
 

7/6-9/06

5 33 42 19 1  
 

6/1-4/06

6 30 46 18 -  
  5/8-11/06 4 25 45 25 -  
  4/10-13/06 5 33 40 23 -  
 

3/13-16/06

4 30 45 20 1  
 

2/6-9/06

4 34 42 20 -  
 

1/20-22/06

5 34 41 18 1  
 

1/9-12/06

8 35 37 18 1  
 

12/19-22/05

6 33 39 22 -  
 

12/5-8/05

6 31 43 20 -  
 

11/17-20/05

5 32 39 24 -  
 

11/7-10/05

3 29 47 21 -  
 

10/24-26/05

3 26 45 25 1  
 

10/13-16/05

3 25 46 26 -  
 

9/26-28/05

3 28 41 27 1  
 

9/12-15/05

3 28 44 25 -  
 

8/22-25/05

4 30 42 24 -  
 

8/8-11/05

4 32 46 18 -  
 

7/25-28/05

4 28 44 23 1  
 

7/7-10/05

3 33 45 18 1  
 

6/16-19/05

4 33 40 23 -  
 

6/6-8/05

4 31 45 20 -  
 

5/23-26/05

3 37 41 19 -  
 

5/2-5/05

1 30 44 25 -  
 

4/18-21/05

2 29 44 24 1  
 

4/4-7/05

3 29 49 18 1  
 

3/21-23/05

2 30 43 24 1  
 

3/7-10/05

3 32 48 16 1  
 

2/21-24/05

5 33 42 20 -  
 

2/7-10/05

3 37 44 16 -  
  1/3-5/05 3 38 42 17 -  
  12/5-8/04 2 35 43 19 1  
 

11/7-10/04

3 33 44 20 -  
 

10/11-14/04

2 32 44 22 -  
 

10/9-10/04

4 31 40 24 1  
 

9/13-15/04

3 36 39 22 -  
  8/9-11/04 3 36 40 21 -  
  7/30 - 8/1/04 6 32 39 23 1  
  7/8-11/04 5 32 41 21 1  
 

6/3-6/04

3 32 44 21 -  
  5/2-4/04 2 27 43 27 1  
  4/5-8/04 3 31 44 22 -  
  3/8-11/04 2 30 44 24 -  
  2/9-12/04 2 31 46 21 -  
  1/12-15/04 3 34 42 21 -  
  1/2-5/04 3 40 41 16 -  
  12/11-14/03 3 34 44 19 -  
  11/3-5/03 2 28 49 21 -  
  10/24-26/03 2 24 44 30 -  
  10/6-8/03 2 20 50 27 1  
  9/8-10/03 1 20 49 30 -  
  8/4-6/03 1 24 52 23 -  
  7/7-9/03 1 23 50 26 -  
  6/12-15/03 1 25 49 25 -  
  5/19-21/03 1 20 47 31 1  
  5/5-7/03 1 21 50 28 -  
  4/7-9/03 2 25 51 22 -  
  3/29-30/03 1 25 51 23 -  
  3/24-25/03 3 30 47 20 -  
  3/3-5/03 1 21 46 32 -  
  2/17-19/03 1 17 48 34 -  
  2/3-6/03 2 20 53 25 -  
  1/20-22/03 1 19 49 31 -  
  1/13-16/03 2 20 50 28 -  
  12/19-22/02 1 23 48 28 -  
  12/5-8/02 2 23 51 24 -  
  11/22-24/02 2 30 45 23 -  
  10/31 - 11/3/02 2 26 45 26 1  
  10/3-6/02 2 24 46 27 1  
  9/23-26/02 2 25 47 25 1  
  9/5-8/02 2 22 53 23 -  
  8/19-21/02 1 23 47 28 1  
  8/5-8/02 1 27 52 19 1  
  7/29-31/02 2 27 48 22 1  
  7/22-24/02 2 25 48 24 1  
  7/9-11/02 2 26 51 20 1  
  6/17-19/02 2 35 43 19 1  
  6/3-6/02 3 33 49 14 1  
  5/20-22/02 3 38 46 12 1  
  5/6-9/02 2 33 51 14 -  
  4/22-24/02 2 37 46 14 1  
  4/8-11/02 2 36 51 11 -  
  3/4-7/02 3 31 51 14 1  
  2/4-6/02 2 26 55 16 1  
  1/7-9/02 2 27 54 16 1  
  12/6-9/01 2 29 53 16 -  
  11/8-11/01 2 29 50 19 -  
  10/11-14/01 2 36 48 13 1  
  9/14-15/01 3 43 44 9 1  
  9/7-10/01 2 30 49 19 -  
  8/16-19/01 2 34 49 14 1  
  7/19-22/01 3 38 47 11 1  
  6/11-17/01 3 39 45 12 1  
  5/10-14/01 3 37 45 15 -  
  4/6-8/01 4 41 41 14 -  
  3/5-7/01 3 43 43 10 0  
  2/1-4/01 7 44 36 13 -  
  1/10-14/01 11 56 27 6 -  
  12/2-4/00 12 51 28 8 1

 

 Real Estate Taxes:  Real estate taxes on Long Island are the highest in the United States. In Nassau County, for example, the school taxes are about 65% to 70% of the tax dollar. In Nassau, there are 56 districts while in Suffolk there are 68. According to a study on "Budgets and Taxes" published in Newsday on May 1st, 2006 a complete summary of the 124 districts, the proposed budgets for 2006-2007 and the % change over the prior year was published.  While there were a small amount of districts with slightly lower or no change budgets, the predominance of the districts showed single and double digit growth.  The largest proposed increase was 33.42% in Suffolk and 15.01% in Nassau. It is forecast that the taxes will again rise in 2007 predominately caused by the school taxes.

Mortgage Interest Rates

The Fed has raised interest rates successively through most of last year and part of this year. We will see what the new FED Chairman has in mind but we forecast that interest rates won't go up much more.  In fact during October and November mortgage interest rates have been declining.  As of November 22nd, 2006 the 30 year fixed rate was 6.36% down from 6.46% the prior week.  The 15 year fixed rate was 6.06% down from 6.18%. The 1 year ARM was 5.84% up from 5.76%.Mortgage rates should remain at near  lows of late 2006 for  at least  the next two to three quarters. This is after having risen most of the first three quarters of 2006.

By the 4th Quarter, economic activity should prompt the FED to start to raise interest rates again which will negatively impact mortgage rates and this should start the rates on the upward cycle going into middle of 2008.

According to Home Finance of America, 12/8/2006, the basic mortgage rates are as follows:

        30 Year Fixed: 5.750%, APR: 5.89 %

        15 Year Fixed: 5.50%,  APR 5.60%

It is forecast that the mortgage interest rates will  rise by 20-40 basis points by the end of 2007.

 Historically, as of December 31, 2005, the 30 year fixed rate mortgage is approximately 6.4%.  The 15 year fixed rate mortgage is approximately 5.9% while the 1 year adjustable rate mortgage is approximately 5.75%

Prime  Interest Rates

According to Citibank as of 11/30/20006 the prime rate was 8.25%

Historically the prime rate is as follows:

          Prime Rate                    Date

  1. 8.25                            July 1st, 2006

  2. 8.00                            May 11th, 2006

  3. 7.75                            March 29th, 2006

  4. 7.50                            February 1st, 2006

  5. 7.25                            December 15th, 2005

  6. 7.00                            November 2nd, 2005

  7. 6.75                            September 21st, 2005

  8. 6.50                            August 10th, 2005

  9. 6.25                            July 1st, 2005

  10. 6.00                            May 4th, 2005

  11. 5.75                            March 23rd, 2005

  12. 5.50                            February 3rd, 2005

  13. 5.25                            December 15th, 2004

  14. 5.00                            November 12th, 2004

  15. 4.75                            September 22nd, 2004

  16. 4.50                            August 12th, 2004

  17. 4.25                            July 2nd, 2004

  18. 4.00                            June 27th, 2003

  19. 4.25                            November 7th, 2002

  20. 4.75                            December 12th, 2001

  21. 5.00                            November 7th, 2001

  22. 6.75                            June 28th, 2001

  23. 7.00                            May 16th, 2001

  24. 7.50                            April 19th, 2001

  25. 8.00                             March 21, 2001

  26. 8.50                            February 1st, 2001

  27. 9.00                            January 4th, 2001

  28. 9.50                            May 17th, 2000

  29. 9.00                            March 24th, 2000

  30. 8.75                            February 2nd, 2000

  31. 8.50                            November 17th, 1999

  32. 8.25                            August 25th, 1999

  33. 8.00                            July 1st, 1999

 

Bond Interest Rates:         Historically, as of December 30th, 2005 the yield for the 30 year bond was 4.53% while the yield for the 10 year bond was 4.38% and the yield for the 5 year was 4.35% and the two year bond was 4.40%.

Acccording to CNN Money.com  as of December 8th, 2006, the interest rates and yields were as follows:

Bonds
2 yr 99 31/32 -4/32 4.63 +0.06
5 yr 100 1/32 -6/32 4.48 +0.04
10 yr 100 27/32 -9/32 4.51 +0.03
30 yr 98 1/32 -11/32 4.62 +0.02

 

   Is this the beginning of the inverted yield curve? There is good reason to believe so.  What will the Fed Chairman do?  It remains to be seen but this will be high on the priority list.

This is an inverted yield curve on the left.  Note that the yield is very high for the short term maturities and very low for the long term maturities.  It should be just the opposite.  A normal yield curve is on the right.

                               

Historically, an inverted yield curve has been viewed as an indicator of a pending economic recession. When short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates, market sentiment suggests that the long-term outlook is poor and that the yields offered by long-term fixed income will continue to fall. More recently, this viewpoint has been called into question as foreign purchases of securities issued by the U.S. Treasury have created a high and sustained level of demand for products backed by U.S. government debt. When investors are aggressively seeking debt instruments, the debtor can offer lower interest rates. When this occurs, many argue that it is the laws of supply and demand, rather than impending economic doom and gloom, that enable lenders to attract buyers without having to pay higher interest rates.  There is merit to this thinking but, if you continue the logical reasoning, could US debt continue to mound and still have falling interest rates? (To learn more, see Forces Behind Interest Rates and Trying To Predict Interest Rates.) 
 

Consumer Confidence

 The Conference Board reported on December 29th, 2006 that consumer confidence shot up to an eighth month high of 109.0  in December. This is the first December in three years where the consumer confidence level went down.  RBC financial group said, "that its monthly measure of U.S. consumer confidence dropped more than 5 points to 86.9 from 92.4 in November, as consumers expressed concern about current and future economic conditions, as well as investing."

  It is forecast that consumer confidence will rise to over 115-123 by the end of the year.  This will primarily be do to the rebuilding efforts of the damage of Hurricane Katrina, a solution to the war in Iraq (exit strategy), rebuilding of the World Trade Center, The Presidential Elections and continued moderate economic growth.

 

 
Conference Board CONSUMER CONFIDENCE INDEX conducted by TNS (methodology)

.

   

Consumer
Confidence
Index

(1985=100)

Present
Situation
Index

Expectations
Index

 

.

  Nov. 2006 * 102.9 123.6 89.2  
  Oct. 2006 ** 105.1 125.1 91.9  
  Sept. 2006 105.9 128.3 91.0  
  Aug. 2006 100.2 123.9 84.4  
  July 2006 107.0 134.2 88.9  
  June 2006 105.4 132.2 87.5  
  May 2006 104.7 134.1 85.1  
  April 2006 109.8 136.2 92.3  
  March 2006 107.5 133.3 90.3  
  Feb. 2006 102.7 130.3 84.2  
  Jan. 2006 106.8 128.8 92.1  
  Dec. 2005 103.8 120.7 92.6  
  Nov. 2005 98.3 113.2 88.4  
  Oct. 2005 85.2 107.8 70.1  
  Sept. 2005 87.5 110.4 72.3  
  Aug. 2005 105.5 123.8 93.3  
  July 2005 103.6 119.3 93.2  
  June 2005 106.2 120.8 96.4  
  May 2005 103.1 117.8 93.4  
  April 2005 97.5 113.8 86.7  
  March 2005 103.0 117.0 93.7  
  Feb. 2005 104.4 116.8 96.1  
  Jan. 2005 105.1 112.1 100.4  
  Dec. 2004 102.7 105.7 100.7  
  Nov. 2004 92.6 96.3 90.2  
  Oct. 2004 92.9 94.0 92.2  
  Sept. 2004 96.7 95.3 97.7  
  Aug. 2004 98.7 100.7 97.3  
  July 2004 105.7 106.4 105.3  
  June 2004 102.8 105.9 100.8  
  May 2004 93.1 90.5 94.8  
  April 2004 93.0 90.4 94.8  
  March 2004 88.5 84.4 91.3  
  Feb. 2004 88.5 83.3 91.9  
  Jan. 2004 97.7 86.1 105.3  
  Dec. 2003 94.8 76.0 107.4  
  Nov. 2003 92.5 81.0 100.1  
  Oct. 2003 81.7 67.0 91.5  
  Sept. 2003 77.0 59.7 88.5  
  Aug. 2003 81.7 62.0 94.9  
  July 2003 77.0 63.0 86.3  
  June 2003 83.5 64.2 96.4  
  May 2003 83.6 67.3 94.5  
  April 2003 81.0 75.2 84.8  
  Mar. 2003 61.4 61.4 61.4  
  Feb. 2003 64.8 63.5 65.7  
  Jan. 2003 78.8 75.3 81.1  
  Dec. 2002 80.7 69.6 88.1  
  Nov. 2002 84.9 78.3 89.3  
  Oct. 2002 79.6 77.2 81.1  
  Sept. 2002 93.7 88.5 97.2  
  Aug. 2002 94.5 93.1 95.5  
  July 2002 97.4 99.4 96.1  
  June 2002 106.3 104.9 107.2  
  May 2002 110.3 111.2 109.7  
  April 2002 108.5 106.8 109.6  
  March 2002 110.7 111.5 110.2  
  Feb. 2002 95.0 96.4 94.0  
  Jan. 2002 97.8 98.1 97.6  
  Dec. 2001 94.6 97.8 92.4  
  Nov. 2001 84.9 96.2 77.3  
  Oct. 2001 85.3 107.2 70.7  
  Sept. 2001 97.0 125.4 78.1  
  Aug. 2001 114.0 144.5 93.7  
  July 2001 116.3 151.3 92.9  
  June 2001 118.9 156.8 93.5  
  May 2001 116.1 159.6 87.1  
  April 2001 109.9 156.0 79.1  
  March 2001 116.9 167.5 83.1  
  Feb. 2001 109.2 167.1 70.7  
  Jan. 2001 115.7 170.4 79.3  
  Dec. 2000 128.6 176.1 96.9  
  Nov. 2000 132.6 179.7 101.2  
  Oct. 2000 135.8 176.8 108.4  
  Sept. 2000 142.5 182.5 115.9  
  Aug. 2000 140.8 181.3 113.9  
  July 2000 143.0 186.8 113.7  
  June 2000 139.2 180.1 111.9  
  May 2000 144.7 183.6 118.7  
  April 2000 137.7 179.8 109.7  
  March 2000 137.1 182.5 106.8  
  Feb. 2000 140.8 180.1 114.6  
  Jan. 2000 144.7 183.1 119.1

 

Budget Deficits                                       

According to the White House Office of Management and Budget, the projected deficit for 2006 will be -$423.2 billion and for 2007 it will be -$352.2 billion.

Housing:                                

                                                In a New York Times article heading August 6th, 2006 reports that inventory is soaring, buyers taking their time and sellers lowering their sights. Inventory is up across the board.  More on this later. An article earlier on in the year by Newsday, 4/18/2006 headlines that the housing market pace is slowing.

                                                In New York City it is expected that the condominium market could fall by 3%-5% while the cooperative market could rise 10%-15%.  This is caused by the fact that the cooperative prices are extremely low when compared to the other housing prices and thus the demand has shifted to them.  Additionally, the outer boroughs of Manhattan are also being positively affected due to the continued increases of rents and housing prices in Manhattan. However, there is a glut of condominiums on the market, including the "to be builts" in the pipeline.  There are also substantial New Jersey projects, in excess of 10,000 units overlooking lower Manhattan with 6 minute train access time, being held in abeyance.  

                                                  In Nassau County the median price of houses is forecast to fall by 6%-8% for the year.   The median price of houses in Suffolk County is expected to fall 4%-6% for the year.  In Suffolk, the median price of houses is expected to stay between 0% and 2% for the year.

 As of November 22nd, 2006 the median prices of houses were as follows: Nassau- $480,000; Suffolk- $402,000; Queens-$490,000.

In a Newsday article dated November 11th, 2006, the median home prices in Nassau and Suffolk houses fell as follows: Nassau $500,000 in October 2005 to $472,300 in November 2006, Suffolk $400,000 October 2005 to $390,000 in November 2006, Queens $462,800 in October 2005 to $477,900 in November 2006. Additionally the number of  homes on the market increased as follows: Nassau 6,575 October 2005 to 9,769 November 2006, Suffolk 9,358 October 2005 to 13,923 November 2006, Queens 6,243 October 2006 to 10,047 November 2006.

Interesting facts:

In this market, setting the right first price is important.  If set correctly, the property will move the quickest.  Numerous agents are working with their sellers and even sharing the cost to bring in an appraiser to help properly set the price.

Glass condominiums were the top choice by architects and residents for residents in Manhattan.

According to a Prudential Douglas Elliman report written by Miller Samuel, new residential construction is almost entirely condominiums which have lead to a 60% increase in condo inventory.  Co-op inventory reported is up about 7%.  Their Manhattan 3rd Quarter 2006 reports two interesting statistics: The average sales prices is down 7% from the prior quarter $1,288,748 current quarter, $1,380,193 prior quarter.  The average sale price per square foot for the current quarter is $1,050 while the average sale price per square foot for the prior quarter is $1,083 down 3%. The number of days of the market (DOM) from the last date went from 150 days in the current quarter from 144 days in the prior quarter, up 4.2%.  The listing discount from last date on the market went from 3.5% to 4%.

Additionally the report addressed the cooperative market.  " Price indicators fell from prior quarter records but remained above prior year levels.  The average sale price of a Manhattan Co-op apartment fell 16.1% from the prior quarter to $1,296,452 but was up 13.8% over the prior year quarter  average sale price of $956,490.

The Miller Samuel report also addresses the mood of the buyers and seller and says ,,," the sense of urgency is missing, standoff between buyers and sellers remains."

In the luxury market, "prices saw greater gains from last year than the overall market. The average sale price was $4,509,833 down from the prior quarter near record average selling price of $5,013,147 but was 17.9% higher than the prior year quarter average sale price of $3,824,079. The average days on market increased 11 days to 161 days as compared to 150 days in the prior quarter. The average sales price of $1,973,569 are virtually unchanged from the prior quarter average of $ 1,974,623 but up 26.2% from the prior year quarter average sales price of  $1,563,388. The average number of days it took to sell a loft apartment was 145 days, 13 days longer than the prior quarter and 29 days longer than the same period a year ago."

In the loft market, " prices weakened from the prior quarter but above prior year quarter. All price indicators fell from the records set in the prior quarter but remain higher than the same period last year."

There are various sources reporting the "market weakness" could last 6 months to a year or so.  This is traditionally a slow time in housing going into the holidays.  The statistics in the 2nd quarter will be more meaningful.

The assessor in Nassau County is sharply expanding real estate taxes of owners of illegal multi family housing according to Newsday article dated October 4th, 2006. A front page article in Newsday earlier dated October 2nd, 2006 showed an old property tax bill on a sample house like this of $5,912 going to $33,765.  Other houses cited showed a 4 to 5 fold increase in real estate taxes.

According to a Newsday article dated October 20th, 2006, New York City will build affordable housing on the Queens site that was part of the Olympics bid.  It will be 5,000 units with the average rent being $1,200 to $2,500 for families in the income range of $60,000 to $150,000. The construction will begin in 2008. It is noted that this initiative will be the largest affordable housing project since Brooklyn's Starrett City opened in the 1970's.

The most common value enhancing improvements that pay off reported by the New York Times, November 5th, 2006 are: renovated lobby, playroom, gym, roof deck, roof replacement, boilers and burners, elevators, full time doormen.

The use of Feng Shui is growing more popular in real estate decorating decisions.  What is feng shui exactly.  It is phonetically pronounced as "fung schway".  It is a methodolgy of the alignment of living spaces to maximize "chi" or living energy.  It also maximized the flow and balance of natural energy.  It uses a special compass called a "lou pan" or an octagonal map called a " bagua".  Along with either one of these, depending upon the practicioner, numerology and astrology also come into play.  Real estate experts report that it makes the house more marketable, however no known studies have been known to be done along with appropriate peer review.

 

 

The latest home price figures as reported by the Multiple Listing Service of Long Island are as follows:

QUEENS

November 2005            $455,000

October 2006                $477,900

November 2006            $505,000

NASSAU

November 2005            $490,000

October 2006                $472,300

November 2006            $485,000

SUFFOLK

November 2005            $390,000

October 2006                $390,000

November 2006            $395,000

 

Below are the historical median sales prices of homes for Nassau, Suffolk and Queens Counties.

 

Year                Median           %change                    Number of                  % change from         

                        Sale                From                           Listings                       Previous Year           

Price               Previous Year

                                                             Nassau County

2005               $490,000       12.64                          28,507                        18.59

2004                  435,000       12.99                          24,038                        17.90

2003                  385,000         6.94                          20,388                        31.25

2002                  360,000       19.60                         15,534                        -4.02

2001                  301,000       20.40                         16,184                        12.83

2000                  250,000                                          14,344

                                   

                                                            Suffolk County

2005               $390,000         8.03                          38,535                        20.73

2004                  361,000       13.34                          31,918                        14.81

2003                  318,500       15.82                          27,800                        26.24

2002                  275,000       19.57                          22,021                          2.82

2001                  230,000       21.31                          21,418                           3.92

2000                  189,600                                           20,611           

                                                            Queens County

 

2005               $455,000       18.18                         27,109                        27.12

2004                  385,000       15.10                         21,325                        12.51

2003                  334,500       15.74                         18,954                        39.31

2002                  289,000       25.65                         13,606                          4.43

2001                  230,000       15.87                         13,029                        -4.01

2000                 198,500                                           13,573                       

 Source: Long Island Board of Realtors

 

As stated earlier, The housing market has shown signs of cooling off but by no means a burst of a bubble, at least, not as of this writing. According to Associated Press, 11/20/2006, the National Association of Realtors said sales of existing homes fell in 38 States and the prices of homes slid in 45 Metropolitan areas.  According to the Census Bureau, housing starts plunged nearly 15% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.49 million in October 2006 from a revised 1.74 million in September 2006.

For an historical perspective, new home construction slowed in October 2005 with an annualized construction rate of about 2.2 million homes which was a fall of 5.6 % the largest decline in almost six years.  The National Association has an index called the Housing Market Index, which is their way of looking at the statistics.  In October is fell about 6 points to 60 which is mid point for their index.  This “slowdown” is interpreted by many as simply a return to “normal” growth.

 The housing market is estimated to be just beginning to approach  the point where "normal" supply and demand relationships will prevail. This normal supply and demand balance is expected to occur late in 2008.  Normal supply and demand is defined as:

                    1. A small amount of marketing time or days on market (DOM) about 3-6 months for the mainstream house.

                    2. A 5% -10% difference (lower) between asking price and ultimate selling price. 

As the market gets there, it will go through a phenomenon.  Very little inventory ( which has been the case over the last year or two) proceeding to a seeming flood of inventory of houses for sale during the winter months, leading to a reasonable balance late in the 4th quarter of 2008 which will lead to the stimulus of the start of new construction.  This is the basic description of a "market cycle".

In this process there will be some market disintermediation at the upper to extreme upper-end of the housing spectrum. Given the juxtaposition to New York City ( the financial and cultural capital of the world) and the overall strong world economy, the housing market in general, as measured by the median sales price, will finish the year 2007 slightly behind than the beginning of the year with low single digit percentage declines  in Nassau ( -5% to -10%), Suffolk ( -6% to -11%) ,  and Queens ( -3% to -5%). The condominium market in New York City is forecast to decline ( -10% to -15%).

Some of my esteemed colleagues in the industry have published detailed housing reports for New York City and boroughs.  Many go through each neighborhood reciting current prices for both condominiums and cooperatives, historical prices and other information.  To access those reports, the web site contact information is listed in the rear of this forecast.   

Office Rents:             $41.75 to $53.50 ( not including the extreme upper end i.e penthouses etc.)  per s/f effective rent Class A Manhattan with higher rents probable in the new buildings with spikes for penthouse spaces,  $29.50 - $33.00 per s/f effective rent Class A on Long Island. But there has been developing shadow office space a/k/a sublease space.  It has been coming on the market in significant quantities over the last year. The market has been reasonably strong but office vacancies have been reported to increase in the last quarter of 2006.

                                     New office construction doesn't make economic sense unless rents are greater than $30.00 per square foot on Long Island and $50.00 plus in Manhattan. At the present time there are four  significant projects  underway and all report doing well on Long Island.  Most notably  the Times Square office section is doing very well.

 Overall office vacancy rates in both Nassau and Suffolk County are expected to increase slightly.  In Nassau is could rise to 8.0% while in Suffolk is could rise to 11.25%.  Office vacancy overall in Manhattan is forecast to be in the 7% to 8% range for the upper level space in the mid-town market.  The downtown market is forecast to be in the 9% range for the high end space.

         Of note, Manhattan office buildings have been selling for over $1,000 per square foot.  Just recently reported by Newsday, 11/28/2006, The Towers, a 150,000 square foot building at 111 Great Neck Road sold last months to Philips International for $52.5 Million or $350 per square foot. It also reported the following: EAB Plaza now Reckson Plaza sold just under $250 per square foot last year and the Computer Associates headquarters sold for $263 per square foot.

From an historical perspective the office markets in both New York City and Long Island are about at the same point in the economic cycle.  There is little  speculative building.  In New York City there was a lot of space being taken by start up companies financed by venture capitalists.  Since venture capital money is typically short term  or about 2 years, what happens is these companies don't perform well and the venture capital money is called. Should the international business influx continue into New York City, this also will continue the economic picture  positively.

Since the first beams of the World Trade Center have just been installed ( 12/19/2006 amid the speeches and ceremonies)  the statistics of the World Trade Center loss will be summarized.  Added to that will be the World's Tallest Buildings so that a comparison between the New World Trade Center, a building you have in mind and the world's tallest buildings can be examined and compared.

                                                                  World Trade Center Attack Statistics

 On September 11th, 2001, two domestic hijacked planes crashed into both of the World Trade Center Towers eventually destroying both along with much collateral damage.

 As reported by the New York Times, September 23, 2001 a list of the directly and perimeter damaged buildings.

 World Trade Center Building Destroyed                                                                          Gross Square Feet

 

1 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                   4,761,416

2 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                   4,761,416

7 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                   2,000,000

5 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                    783,520

4 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                     576,000

6 World Trade Center                                                                                                                                     537,694

World Trade Center Total                                                                                                                            13,420,046

Perimeter Office Buildings Damaged                                                                               Gross Square Feet

2 World Financial Center                                                                                                                                 2,591,244

3 World Financial Center                                                                                                                                 2,263,855

1 Liberty Plaza                                                                                                                                                  2,121,437

4 World Financial Center                                                                                                                                 2,083,555

1 World Financial Center                                                                                                                                 1,461,365

1 Bankers Trust Plaza                                                                                                                                      1,415,086

140 West Street                                                                                                                                                 1,171,540

90 Church Street                                                                                                                                                    950,000

195 Broadway                                                                                                                                                        875,000

22 Cortlandt Street                                                                                                                                                 668,110

30 West Broadway                                                                                                                                                 381,090

130 Cedar Street                                                                                                                                                   135,000

114 Liberty Street                                                                                                                                                     69,004

26 Cortlandt Street                                                                                                                                                   25,000

106 Liberty Street                                                                                                                                                     18,000

110 Liberty Street                                                                                                                                                        6,000

Perimeter Total                                                                                                                                                         16,585,286

 Overall Total                                                                                                                                                              30,005,332

 

COMPELLING ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS

With the World Trade Center and related buildings being out of action since 9/11/2001 a look at the compelling economic implications is given for economic perspective. Assuming a office market rent of $40 per square foot, there is a total loss of rent of $536,801,840 ( does not include the damaged buildings)  not to mention the multiplier effect of employment.  Assume one person for every 150 square feet and an average salary of $50,000 the economic amount lost to this area is $4,473,348,667.

                                                                    World's Tallest Buildings

According to AboutArchitecture.com  following is a list of the world's tallest buildings including the World Trade Center.  Building listed in shaded boxes are proposed.

 

World's Tallest Buildings Ranked
Buildings in shaded boxes are proposed, not completed,
or no longer standing. For completed buildings, scroll down.

 

Building & Location Year Sto-
ries
Height
Chief
Architect
M.
Ft.
Burj Dubai ,
Dubai, UAE
(under construction)
2008? 160 800   Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
Center of India Tower, Katangi, India (speculative) 2008?
224
677
2,222  
Tower of Russia, Moscow, Russia
(proposed)
 
2010? 134 648 2,129  
International Business Center, Seoul, S. Korea (proposed) 2008? 130 580 1,903  
Lotte World II
Busan S. Korea
(proposed)
2012? 107 512 1,680 Steven Huh, ParkerDurrant International
Taipei 101 Tower
Taipei, Taiwan

 
2004 101  509 1,670 C.Y. Lee & Partner
Shanghai World Financial Center, China
(under construction)
2007?
101
492
1,614 Kohn Pederson Fox
Union Square Phase 7, Hong Kong, China (under construction) 2007? 102 474 1,555  
Suyong Bay Tower, Busan, S. Korea
(proposed)
 
2010? 102 462 1,516 Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates
Xujiahui Tower, Shanghai, China
(proposed)
  92 460 1,509  
Petronas Tower 1, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1998 88 452
1,483
Petronas Twin Tower 2, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1998 88 452
1,483
The Gateway III, Hong Kong, China
(proposed)
 
?   450 1,476  
Sears Tower, Chicago 1974 110 442
1,450
Asia Plaza, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
(proposed)
2008? 103 431 1,414 TMA Architects & Associates
Jin Mao Building, Shanghai 1999 88 421
1,381
Dalian International Trade Center, Dalian China (proposed) 2007? 78 420
1,378
 
Freedom Tower at the World Trade Center
New York
(under construction)
2011?    417 1,368
(1,776
with
spire)
Daniel Libeskind / Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
World Trade Center, New York
Destroyed by terrorists 9/11/01
1973 110 417
1,368
Two International Finance Centre (IFC), Hong Kong 2003 88 415  
Sky Central Plaza (CITI Plaza, China International Trust) Guanzhou
1997
80
391
1,283
DLN Architects
North Bund Tower, Shanghai, China (proposed) ? 72 388 1,273 John Portman & Associates
Shun Hing Square, Shenzhen, China
1996
69
384
1,260
K.Y. Cheung Design Assc.
Empire State Building, New York 1931 102 381
1,250
Shreve, Lamb and Harmon
Abbco Rotana Hotel, Dubai, UAE (proposed)
 
2006 72 380 1,247 Khatib & Alami
Central Plaza, Hong Kong 1992 78 374 1,227
Ng Chun Man
Bank of China Tower, Hong Kong 1989 70 369 1,209
Bank of America Tower, New York City USA (under construction) 2008? 54 366 1,200 Cook+Fox
Millenium Tower Frankfurt Germany
(proposed)
2011? 91 365 1,198 Albert Speer & Partner GmbH
Emirates Tower One, Dubai 1999 54 355 1,165  
T & C Tower (Tuntex Sky Tower), Kaoshiung, Taiwan 1997 85 348 1,140  
Aon Centre, Chicago 1973 80 346 1,136  
The Center, Hong Kong 1998 79 346 1,135
Ng Chun Man
John Hancock Center, Chicago 1969 100 344 1,127  
Shimao International Plaza, Shanghai, China 2005 60 333 1,093 East China Architecture and Design Institute
Wuhan International Securities Building, Wuhan 2005 68 331 1,087  
Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang, N. Korea 1995 105 330 1,083  
Shanghai 2. Q1 Gold Coast, Australia 2005 79 322 1,058  
Burj al Arab Hotel, Dubai 1998 60 321 1,053  
Chrysler Building, New York 1930 77 319 1,046
William Van Alen
Bank of America, Atlanta 1993 55 312 1,023  
U.S. Bank Tower, Los Angeles 1990 75 310 1,018  
Menara Telekom Headquarters, Kuala Lumpur 1999 55 310 1,017  
Emerates Tower Two, Dubai 1999 56 309 1,114  
AT&T Corporate Center, Chicago 1989 60 307 1,007  
JP Morgan Chase Tower, Houston 1982 75 305 1,000  
Baiyoke Tower II, Bangkok 1997 85 304 997  
Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago 1990 64 303 995  
Kingdom Centre, Riyadh 2002 41 302 992  
Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang, N. Korea 1995 105 300 984  
First Canadian Place, Toronto 1975 72 298 978  
Wells Fargo Plaza,
Houston
1983 71 296 972  
Landmark Tower, Yokohama, Japan 1993 70 296 971  
311 South Wacker Drive, Chicago 1990 65 293 961  
SEG Plaza, Shenzhen 2000 71 292 957  
American International Building, New York 1932 67 290 952  
Key Tower, Cleveland 1991 57 289 947 Cesar Pelli
Plaza 66, Shanghai 2001 66 288 945  
One Liberty Place, Philadelphia 1987 61 288 945  
Bank of America Center, Seattle 1985 76 285 937  
Sunjoy Tomorrow Square, Shanghai 2003 55 285 934  
Cheung Kong Center, Hong Kong 1999 63 283 929  
Chongqing World Trade Center, Chongqing 2005 60 283 929  
The Trump Building, New York 1930 72 283 927  
Bank of America Plaza, Dallas 1985 72 281 921  
Overseas Union Bank Centre, Singapore 1986 66 280 919  
United Overseas Bank Plaza,
Singapore
1992 66 280 919  
Republic Plaza, Singapore 1995 66 280 919  
Citicorp Center, New York 1977 59 279 915  
Hong Kong New World Tower, Shanghai 2002 61 278 913  
Scotia Plaza, Toronto 1989 68 275 902  
Williams Tower, Houston 1983 64 275 901  
Renaissance Tower, Dallas 1975 56 270 886  
Dapeng International Plaza, Guangzhou 2004 56 269 883  
21st Century Tower, Dubai 2003 55 269 883  
900 North Michigan Ave., Chicago 1989 66 265 871  
Bank of America Corporate Center, Charlotte 1992 60 265 871  
SunTrust Plaza, Atlanta 1992 60 265 871  
Triumph Palace, Moscow 2004 61 264 866  
Shenzhen Special Zone Daily Tower, Shenzhen 1998 42 264 866  
Tower Palace Three, Tower G, Seoul 2004 73 264 865  
Trump World Tower, New York 2001 72 262 861  
Grand Gateway: Office Tower One, Shanghai, China 2005 55 262 859  
Water Tower Place, Chicago 1976 74 262 859  
Aon Center, Los Angeles 1974 62 262 858  
BCE Place–Canada Trust Tower, Toronto 1990 51 261 856  
Transamerica Corporate Headquarters, San Francisco 1972 48 260 853  
Commerzbank Tower, Frankfurt 1997 56 259 850  
G.E. Building, New York 1933 70 259 850  
Bank One Plaza, Chicago 1969 60 259 850  
Two Liberty Place, Philadelphia 1990 58 258 848  
Philippine Bank of Communications, Makati 2000 55 258 848  
Park Tower, Chicago 2000 67 257 844  
Messeturm, Frankfurt 1990 63 257 843  
Sorrento 1, Hong Kong 2003 75 256 841  
U.S. Steel Tower, Pittsburgh 1970 64 256 841  
Mok-dong Hyperion Tower A, Seoul 2003 69 256 840  
Rinku Gate Tower, Osaka 1996 56 256 840  
The Harbourside, Hong Kong 2003 74 255 837  
Langham Place Office Tower, Hong Kong 2004 59 255 837  
Capital Tower, Singapore 2000 52 254 833  
Highcliff, Hong Kong 2003 73 253 831  
World Trade Center, Osaka 1995 55 252 827  
Bank of Shanghai Headquarters, Shanghai 2005 46 252 827  
Jiali Plaza, Wuhan 1997 61 251 824  
Rialto Towers, Melbourne 1986 63 251 824 Gerard de Preu / Perrott Lyon Mathieson
One Atlantic Center, Atlanta 1988 50 250 820  
Chelsea Tower, Dubai 2005 49 250 820  
Wisma 46,Jakarta 1995 46 250 820  
Korea Life Insurance Company, Seoul 1985 60 249 817  
CitySpire, New York 1989 75 248 814  
One Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York 1961 60 248 813  
State Tower, Bangkok 2001 68 247 811  
Bank One Tower, Indianapolis 1989 48 247 811  
Condé Nast Building, New York 1999 48 247 809  
MetLife, New York 1963 59 246 808  
Bloomberg Tower, New York 2004 55 246 806  
JR Central Towers, Nagoya 2000 51 245 804  
Shin Kong Life Tower, Taipei, Taiwan 1993 51 244 801  
Malayan Bank, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1988 50 244 799  
Tokyo City Hall, Tokyo 1991 48 243 797  
Woolworth Building, New York 1913 57 241 792
Mellon Bank Center, Philadelphia 1991 54 241 792  
John Hancock Tower, Boston 1976 60 240 788
Deutsche Bank Place: 126 Phillip Street, Sydney, Australia 2005 39 240 787  
Bank One Center, Dallas 1987 60 240 787  
Commerce Court West, Toronto 1973 57 239 784  
Moscow State University, Moscow 1953 26 239 784  
Empire Tower, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1994 62 238 781  
NationsBank Center, Houston 1984 56 238 780  
Roppongi Hills Mori Tower , Tokyo, Japan 2003 54 238    
Bank of America Center, San Francisco 1969 52 237 779  
Worldwide Plaza, New York 1989 47 237 778  
One Canada Square, London 1991 50 237 777  
IDS Center, Minneapolis 1973 52 236 775  
U.S. Bank Place, Minneapolis 1992 58 236 774  
Norwest Center, Minneapolis 1988 57 235 773  
Treasury Building, Singapore 1986 52 235 770  
One Ninety One Peachtree
Tower, Atlanta
1991 50 235 770  
Opera City Tower, Tokyo 1997 54 234 768  
Shinjuku Park Tower, Tokyo 1994 52 233 764  
Heritage Plaza, Houston 1987 52 232 762  
Suzhou Xindi Center, Suzhou, China 2005 54 232 761  
Kompleks Tun Abdul Razak
Building, Penang, Malaysia
1985 65 232 760  
The Arch, Hong Kong, China 2005 65 231 758  
Palace of Culture and Science, Warsaw 1955 42 231 758  
Carnegie Hall Tower, New York 1991 60 231 757  
Three First National Plaza, Chicago 1981 57 230 753  
Equitable Tower, New York 1986 51 229 752  
MLC Centre, Sydney 1978 65 229 751  
One Penn Plaza, New York 1972 57 229 750  
1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York 1972 54 229 750  
Prudential Center, Boston 1964 52 229 750  
Two California Plaza, Los Angeles 1992 52 229 750  
Gas Company Tower, Los Angeles 1991 54 228 749  
Two Pacific Place/Shangri-La
Hotel, Hong Kong
1991 56 228 748  
1100 Louisiana Building, Houston 1980 55 228 748  
Korea World Trade Center, Seoul 1988 54 228 748  
Governor Phillip Tower, Sydney 1993 64 227 745

Industrial Rents: $4.75 - $6.05 Net in Brooklyn & Queens

$5.60 - $6.80 Net on Long Island

$9.90 - $11.25 Net on Long Island for new flex space

 

Retail Rents:       $60.00-$65.00 triple net + in the major malls on Long Island

$25.00 - $35.00 prime power centers on Long Island

$600.00 -$625.00 + in Manhattan in the prime retail areas i.e. 5th and Madison Avenues, 57th Street. Areas such as Tribecca, SoHo, the Village and Union Square will show double digit rates of growth. Chelsea should approach double digit growth for the quality locations. The downtown area will show modest gains but will be poised to show double digit gains as the World Trade Center and related buildings become completed and online. This is estimated to be three years away.

All other areas a 3%-4% increases.

Interesting fact:  Regarding "Black Friday", the day after Thanksgiving, traditionally the first day of shopping for the Christmas season, the following was reported by Newsday: 137 Million shoppers expected across the US, 47.1% of consumers will shop on line ( up from 36% three years ago ) and $457.4  Billion in sales ( up from 5% from last year)

Capitalization Rates:

Industrial                       9.750% - 12.00%

Office                           7.75% - 10.5

Retail                           7.50% - 10.75%

Hotel                            8.75% - 10.75%

Assisted Living          9.00%  - 11.00%

Multi-Family               7.25% - 10.00%

 

Property Appreciation Rates:

 

Retail                            1%-1-1/2%

Office                           1%-2%

Industrial                      2% -4%

Multi-family                  2%-3%

Hotel                            2%-4%

Assisted Living          1% - 2%

 

Stock Market:     As of December 8th, 2006 according to CnnMoney.com the market statistics were as follows:

Dow Jones Industrial Average  
12,313.90 +35.49 / +0.29%
 
Dec 8 11:44am ET †
Open: 12,271.28
High (day): 12,332.88
Low (day): 12,258.54
YTD%Change: 14.90%
Volume: 88,062,793.00
Prev. Close: 12,278.41
52-Week Range (Low - High): 10,661.15 - 12,361.00

Put in perspective at that time, the rest of the market indices were as follows:

Dec 8 11:45am ET † Change %Change Level
Dow +35.73 +0.29% 12,314.14
NASDAQ +17.34 +0.71% 2,445.03
S&P +4.59 +0.33% 1,411.88
DJ Wilshire 5000 +46.58 +0.33% 14,246.57
Russell 2000 +3.41 +0.43% 795.70
Philadelphia Semiconductor -1.70 -0.35% 478.86
Dow Transports -13.74 -0.29% 4,740.93
Dow Utilities -1.18 -0.26% 455.95
NYSE Composite +21.22 +0.23% 9,063.20
AMEX Composite +4.97 +0.24% 2,094.32
Morningstar Index +11.41 +0.33% 3,427.85

CLOSE OF YEAR MARKET STATISTICS: The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the year 2006 at 12,463.15 up 16% which was the best performance since 2000.

 

The market will probably have volatile but upward growth starting in the 1st Quarter.  The market could hit a low of 11,500 in the Dow Jones Industrial Average but it is forecast to hit  13,150 by the end of the year . Due to pronounced demographic shifts, the market could reach 20,000 by 2009. Ironically the Dow started 2003 at 10,450. As of the December 30th, it was 10,783.  The low for the year 2005 was 10,000.46 and the high was 10,984.46. The NASDAQ  as of December 30th,  2005 was 2,205.96.  The S&P  was up 14% for the year.  It is forecast that the S&P will increase 8%-10% for 2007.  The Nasdaq was up 9.5% for the year.  It is forecast that the Nasdaq will increase 5% for 2007.  The Russell was up 17% for the year.  It is forecast that the Russell will rise 12%-15% for the year.

Historical Snapshots of Dow Jones Industrial Averages

                                                   

                                          Black Monday (1987)      Black Monday (1987) on the Dow Jones

 

Complete History of the Down Jones Industrial Average through December 4th, 2006

Chart

The NASDAQ and other parts of the market as of December 8th, 2006 are:

 
 
NASDAQ 2437.36 9.67   0.40%
  DJIA 12307.49 29.08   0.24%
  S&P 500 1409.84 2.55   0.18%
  NASDAQ-100 1786.21 8.75   0.49%
  NASDAQ-100 PMI 1773.75 -3.71   0.21%
  NASDAQ-100 AHI 1786.11 -0.10   0.01%
  Russell 1000 766.95 1.29   0.17%
  Russell 2000 792.56 0.27   0.03%
  FTSE All-World ex-US* 235.51 -0.36   0.15%
  FTSE RAFI 1000* 5851.76 9.88   0.17%

 

 

Closing milestones of the Dow Jones Industrial Average

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is a summary of the closing milestones of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the best-known stock market index in the world. Since opening at 40.94 on May 26, 1896, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has grown impressively with several relatively brief periods of decline.

 Milestone Highs and Lows

Like most other stock market indices, the Dow undergoes periods of general increase and general declines or stagnation. A bull market is a term denoting a period of price increases, while a bear market denotes a period of declines. Wall Street generally considers a bear market in session when the main stock market index is more than 20 percent below its all-time high. For the Dow in late 2006, that level is approximately 9,875 points.

There are two types of bull markets. A secular bull market is a period in which the stock market index is continually reaching all-time highs with only brief periods of correction, as during the 1990s, and can last upwards of 15 years. A cyclical bull market is a period in which the stock market index is reaching 52-week or multi-year highs and may briefly peak at all-time highs before a rapid decline, as in the early 1970s. It usually occurs within relatively longer bear markets and lasts about three years.

The following are the secular bull and bear markets experienced by the Dow since its inception:

  • 1896 1929: Bull market. In the summer of 1896 the Dow sheds 30% to set an all-time low of 28.48, but quickly erases its losses, and eventually grows to a closing high of 381.17 (theoretical intra-day high of 386.1) on September 3, 1929.
  • 1930 1948: Bear market. The stock market crash of 1929 precedes the Great Depression. The Dow plunges to 41.22 (theoretical intra-day low of 40.56) on July 8, 1932, thus erasing 36 years of gains. From here, the index would take 22 years to surpass its previous highs.
  • 1949 1966: Bull market. The Dow posts impressive growth in the booming economy following the Second World War . Starting from about 150 in June 1949, when P/E ratios reach multi-decade lows, the index ends just five points below 1,000 on February 9, 1966.
  • 1967 1982: Bear market. Traders deal with a stagnant economy in an inflationary monetary environment. The Dow enters two long downturns in 1970 and 1974; during the latter, it falls nearly 45% to the bottom of a 20-year range. The index approaches the 1,000 milestone at the top of its range three times in 1972, 1976 and 1981, but fails to break the mark decisively.
  • 1982 2000: Bull market. The Dow experiences its most spectacular rise in history. From a meager 777 on August 12, 1982, the index grows more than 1,500% to 11,722.98 (actual and theoretical intra-day highs of 11,750.28 and 11,908.50) by January 14, 2000.
  • 2000 - undetermined: Bear market. The Dow struggles with the 10,000 - 11,000 range for a year and then deteriorates into a panic atmosphere of severe declines punctuated by brief and violent rallies. The index hits a closing low of 7,286.27 (actual and theoretical intra-day lows of 7,197.49 and 7,181.47 the following day), 38% below its highs, on October 9, 2002. The records of early 2000 stood until the fourth quarter of 2006.

On October 3, 2006, the Dow achieved new record closing and intra-day highs for the first time in nearly seven years. Later that month, the index closed above 12,000 for the first time (October 19), and stayed above the milestone to set record weekly (October 27) and monthly (October 31) closing levels. While some experts might consider concurrent record highs in the near future on the DJIA and the Dow Jones Transportation Average as Dow Theory confirmation that the bear market ended in 2002, the depressed state of the technology market compared with 2000 may leave that a matter of dispute. It is notable, however, that both the tech-laden NASDAQ Composite and the broader S&P 500, while not yet at all-time highs, both achieved six-year monthly closing highs concurrently with the DJIA on November 30, 2006.

 Incremental Closing Milestones

The following is a list of the milestone closing levels of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, in 100-point increments.

The first bull market (1896-1929)

Milestone Closing Level Date
100 100.25 January 12, 1906
200 200.93 December 19, 1927
300 300.00 December 31, 1928

The post-World War II boom (1949-1966)

Milestone Closing Level Date
381.171 382.74 November 23, 1954
400 401.97 December 28, 1954
500 500.24 March 12, 1956
600 602.21 February 20, 1959
700 705.52 May 17, 1961
800 800.14 February 28, 1964
900 900.95 January 28, 1965

1This was the Dow's close at the peak of the 1929 bull market, a level that the Dow would not see again for 25 years.

The 1970s bear market (1967-1982)

Milestone Closing Level Date
1000 1,003.16 November 14, 1972

The 1980s bull market (1982-1987)

Milestone Closing Level Date
1100 1,121.81 February 24, 1983
1200 1,209.46 April 26, 1983
1300 1,304.88 May 20, 1985
1400 1,403.44 November 6, 1985
1500 1,511.70 December 11, 1985
1600 1,600.69 February 6, 1986
1700 1,713.99 February 27, 1986
1800 1,804.24 March 20, 1986
1900 1,903.54 July 1, 1986
2000 2,002.25 January 8, 1987
2100 2,102.50 January 19, 1987
2200 2,201.49 February 5, 1987
2300 2,333.52 March 20, 1987
2400 2,405.54 April 6, 1987
2500 2,510.04 July 17, 1987
2600 2,635.84 August 10, 1987
2700 2,700.57 August 17, 1987

The 1990s Superbull (1990-2000)

Milestone Closing Level Date
2800 2,810.15 January 2, 1990
2900 2,900.97 June 1, 1990
3000 3,004.46 April 17, 1991
3100 3,101.52 December 27, 1991
3200 3,201.48 January 3, 1992
3300 3,306.13 April 14, 1992
3400 3,413.21 June 1, 1992
3500 3,500.03 May 19, 1993
3600 3,604.86 August 18, 1993
3700 3,710.77 November 16, 1993
3800 3,803.88 January 6, 1994
3900 3,914.48 January 21, 1994
4000 4,003.33 February 23, 1995
4100 4,138.67 March 24, 1995
4200 4,201.61 April 4, 1995
4300 4,303.98 April 24, 1995
4400 4,404.62 May 10, 1995
4500 4,510.69 June 16, 1995
4600 4,615.23 July 5, 1995
4700 4,702.73 July 7, 1995
4800 4,801.80 September 14, 1995
4900 4,922.75 November 15, 1995
5000 5,023.55 November 21, 1995
5100 5,105.56 November 29, 1995
5200 5,216.47 December 13, 1995
5300 5,304.98 January 29, 1996
5400 5,405.06 February 1, 1996
5500 5,539.45 February 8, 1996
5600 5,600.15 February 12, 1996
5700 5,748.82 May 20, 1996
5800 5,838.52 September 13, 1996
5900 5,904.90 October 1, 1996
6000 6,010.00 October 14, 1996
6100 6,177.71 November 6, 1996
6200 6,206.04 November 7, 1996
6300 6,313.00 November 14, 1996
6400 6,430.02 November 20, 1996
6500 6,547.79 November 25, 1996
6600 6,600.66 January 7, 1997
6700 6,703.09 January 10, 1997
6800 6,833.10 January 17, 1997
6900 6,961.63 February 12, 1997
7000 7,022.44 February 13, 1997
7100 & 7200 7,214.49 May 5, 1997
7300 7,333.55 May 15, 1997
7400 7,435.78 June 6, 1997
7500 7,539.27 June 10, 1997
7600 & 7700 7,711.47 June 12, 1997
7800 7,895.81 July 3, 1997
7900 7,962.31 July 8, 1997
8000 8,038.88 July 16, 1997
8100 8,116.93 July 24, 1997
8200 8,254.89 July 30, 1997
8300 8,314.55 February 11, 1998
8400 8,451.06 February 18, 1998
8500 8,545.72 February 27, 1998
8600 8,643.12 March 10, 1998
8700 8,718.85 March 16, 1998
8800 8,803.05 March 19, 1998
8900 8,906.43 March 20, 1998
9000 9,033.23 April 6, 1998
9100 9,110.02 April 14, 1998
9200 9,211.84 May 13, 1998
9300 9,328.19 July 16, 1998
9400 & 9500 9,544.87 January 6, 1999
9600 9,643.37 January 8, 1999
9700 9,736.08 March 8, 1999
9800 9,897.44 March 11, 1999
9900 9,958.77 March 15, 1999
10000 10,006.78 March 29, 1999
10100 10,197.70 April 8, 1999
10200 & 10300 10,339.51 April 12, 1999
10400 10,411.66 April 14, 1999
10500 10,581.42 April 21, 1999
10600 & 10700 10,727.18 April 22, 1999
10800 10,831.71 April 27, 1999
10900 & 11000 11,014.70 May 3, 1999
11100 11,107.19 May 13, 1999
11200 11,200.98 July 12, 1999
11300 11,326.04 August 25, 1999
11400 11,405.76 December 23, 1999
11500 11,522.56 January 7, 2000
11600 & 11700 11,722.98 January 14, 2000

 

The 2000s dot-com bust aftermath (2002-Present)

Milestone Closing Level Date
11722.98 11,727.34 October 3, 2006
11800 11,850.61 October 4, 2006
11900 11,947.70 October 12, 2006
12000 12,011.73 October 19, 2006
12100 12,116.91 October 23, 2006
12200 12,218.01 November 14, 2006
12300 12,305.82 November 16, 2006

Chart

Record Highs

HOW TO COMPUTE THE DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE

Calculation

To calculate the DJIA, the sum of the prices of all 30 stocks is divided by a "divisor", which is published on the Chicago Board of Trade's website [1]. The divisor is adjusted in case of splits, spinoffs or similar structural changes, to ensure that such events do not in themselves alter the numerical value of the DJIA. The initial divisor was the number of component companies, so that the DJIA was at first a simple arithmetic average; the present divisor, after many adjustments, is less than one (meaning the index is actually larger than the sum of the prices of the component prices). That is:

DJIA = {\sum p \over d}

where p are the prices of the component stocks and d is the Dow Divisor.

Events like stock splits or changes in the list of the companies composing the index alter the sum of the prices of the component prices. In these cases, in order to avoid discontinuity in the index, the Dow divisor is updated so that the quotations right before and after the event coincide:

DJIA = {\sum p_{old} \over d_{old} } = {\sum p_{new} \over d_{new} }

COMPANIES THE MAKE UP THE DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE

The Dow Jones Industrial Average consists of the following 30 companies:

Weights

Because the DJIA is an average of stock prices, it is more strongly affected by relative changes in performance of high-priced stocks than by lower-priced ones. For example, a 100% price increase of a $1 stock would have the same effect on the index as a 1% price increase of a $100 stock, even if both companies had the same market capitalization. In this sense higher-priced stocks have a greater "weight" in the index. A list of the effective weight of each component is published daily [2] by Dow Jones, (although the weights change whenever the prices of the component stocks change). The weights are simply proportional to the stock prices, and are not used in calculating the DJIA.

 

 

 Entertainment

Movies on demand will continue to grow substantially over the next decade.  It will cut into the “movie theatre” business.  This will have a negative impact on the movie theatre business over the next decade. The movie industry by in large had an excellent year according to box office revenues.

 Energy Policy

Historical perspective: For a number of years and even now the United States energy prices were substantially lower than the rest of the industrialized world.  For that reason, many businesses and industries sprouted up based upon a "false sense of energy prices". 

As of July 12th, 2006, gasoline prices reported were

        Yesterday: $3.25

        Day Before: $3.25

Week Ago: $2.43

Record High: 9/11/2005: $3.34

FYI - According to Associates for International Research, Inc. ( www.air-inc.com), Reuter: International Energy, when gas prices were $3.20 in the United States here were the prices from key cities and countries worldwide:

  1. Canada                    $3.42

  2. Mexico                      $2.28

  3. Britain                        $6.70

  4. France                       $7.22

  5. Caracas                    $0.12

  6. Oslo                            $6.90

  7. Germany                    $6.50

  8. Italy                             $6.25

  9. Israel                           $5.28

  10. Egypt                          $0.65

  11. Kenya                         $4.37

  12. Johannesburg           $3.39

  13. Kuwait                        $0.78

  14. Saudi Arabia             $0.61

  15. New Delhi                  $3.71

  16. Beijing                        $2.05

  17. Russia                        $2.50

  18. Japan                         $4.50

  19. Shanghai                    $1.94

  20. Sydney                        $3.42

Historical gas spikes - a look at the past- in inflation adjusted prices

  1. 1973- $ 1.90 - Arab Oil Embargo - President Nixon-Ford

  2. 1979 - $3.25 - Shah of Iran Crisis - President Carter

  3. 1986 - $1.75- Opec Oil Price War - President Regan

  4. 1990 - $2.00 - Iraq invasion of Kuwait - President Bush # 1

  5. 2001 - $1.25 - 9/11 attack

 In every one of the last 10 years of real estate economic forecasts, it has been emphatically stated that the US should devise and implement a policy to get the economy completely off of fossil fuel ( gasoline and natural gas ) within a 10 year time frame. 

 Fossil fuel is a finite resource, meaning it is going to run out at some point in time based upon how much is actually in the ground available to be pumped out and the rate at which it is consumed. 

 It is again recommended that hydrogen become the replacement for fossil fuel and a policy to do that should be implemented immediately with joint cooperation between government and the best minds in business, science and industry.

 Alternative sources such as active and passive energy for new housing construction, wind and certain hydroelectric possibilities should also be factored into the equation.  In 10 years, it will make an enormous difference if the United States did enact a wide sweeping new energy policy incorporating hydrogen power as its main stay.  It will also make an enormous difference if the United States doesn’t implement a new and wide sweeping energy policy.  If the US does implement such a plan it will have substantial and far reaching positive economic and other benefits.  Having a plan can produce benefits in two ways: 1. Businesses plan their policies, new product development around their perceptions of current and forecast energy costs. This promotes greater efficiencies. 2. Having a cohesive energy plan will promote energy savings, conserve resources and promote new energy producing initiatives . If not, it will have detrimental effects. 

 Fossil fuel is going to run out.  The only question is when. The question is what will the predominant energy source of US be when this happens.  If the US has zero dependency on it, that would be ideal. Any type of dependency would present a problem.

Energy - Significant points

A new wave theory of producing energy has been proffered by a few sources, notably Oregon State University ( Newsday 8/27/2005 ).  The process utilized a series of buoys which harness the motion of the ocean's waves to produce electricity which is then delivered via an electric cable.

ENVIRONMENT

Governor Eliot Spitzer of New York will take the oath of office in January.  In Newsday's "Albany Agenda", they report key projects and issues that he and the legislature will have to work out together in order to move forward.  They are : Greenhouse gases, DEC staffing, Brownsfields - following up on the State's 2003 landmark law to get contaminated sites cleaned up, Environmental Protection Funds, Open space and Oceans policy. 

All of these have a profound economic and environmental quality of life effects.  The items listed above don't include additional protection for wetlands. While the Governor-elect clearly has the will, the big question is " will he find the way?"

According to Newsday, 12/13/2006 New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has painted a portrait of how New York City will look in 2030, the challenges that lie ahead and a plan to address them.  He reduced the city's challenges to the least common denominators - " By 2030, nearly 1 million more people will live in the city, the infrastructure will be about a century old and the water supply and the air and land will be pushed to extremes." In the montage behind the mayor's speaking podium, some of the key points read, " Improve travel, ensure all New Yorkers have parks, develop water network back up systems, achieve state of good repair on our transportation, upgrade our energy infrastructure."

 

Global Competitiveness 

The United States ( US ) has dropped from #1 to #6 according to the Global Competitiveness Report released September 26, 2006.  In 2005, US was viewed as the most competitive country in the world.  But according to the World Economic Forum, US has fallen to #6 behind such countries such as Singapore, Denmark, Sweden and Finland.  Additionally, US fell to # 5 from # 1 in a Global Technology Readiness Assessment.

There are nine pillars ( used by World Economic Forum ) critical to driving productivity and competitiveness according to the report.

Immediately after World War II, the US has substantial advantages over most of the world:

The report indicates that while the business competitive component of this sector is stellar, the areas losing ground are public ( military efforts )and private indebtedness, lack of personal savings, declining business transparency, declining educational performance and growing trade imbalance.      

The report goes on to report that US decline in certain major industries such as Ford, GM showing major declines and losing their foothold to Toyota and Honda.

The report also reports that Wall Street, the IPO capital, is losing ground to Shanghai as the launch point for new IPO's.

Additionally the report highlights that the building trades, developers, owners, managers have become static with respect to global competitiveness, technology and innovation.  Although real estate is a "local" market attributes such as the type of real estate product designes, built, operated is continually being subject to international comparison.

Terms such as NextGen buildings, paperless real estate operations are considered "too futuristic" here in the US but have become mainstream around the world.

The entire report can be found at this web address:  http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness%20Report/index.htm

The World Economic Forum's home page can be found at this address: http://www.weforum.org/en/index.htm

 

 

Transportation - Noteworthy points

On Long Island, we basically have two choices, road and rail.  For the rail component, there is nothing really new except the idea of having a third line added to the main line as well as the LIRR being extended to the east side. This is a map of the location.

Following are key excerpts and references from the website of  the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Long Island Railroad.

 

MTA slide showing the LIRR route from Sunnyside Yard to Grand Central Terminal as part of the East Side Access project  It should be possible to replace this fair use image with a freely licensed one. If you can, please do so as soon as is practical.     EAST SIDE ACCESS PROJECT

According to the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) web site, the project ( Metropolitan Transportation Authority MTA known as “ East Side Access”, started construction in  1998.  It  would connect the Port Washington  branch and the Main lines of the LIRR to the station via Sunnyside Yard in Queens and cross the East River on the lower level of the 63rd Street Tunnel, which is currently served on the upper level by the F train of the New York City Subway.

The project cost has jumped in price from US$3 billion in 1998 to US$6.3 billion in 2006, with the biggest and most expensive work yet to be done—tunneling through Manhattan 90 feet (30 m) below the current Metro-North Railroad tracks under Park Avenue, 175 feet (50 m) below the street surface.

There would be no connections between the two sets of tracks. The LIRR concourse would be under Vanderbilt Avenue to the west of Grand Central Terminal. Current plans are to bring 24 trains per hour at peak time to the station (Penn Station currently can handle a maximum of 42 trains an hour at peak).

Information on the LIRR web site goes on to say that the project has so far not run into substantial opposition although some Midtown East businesses have started raising concerns. In addition, Cardinal Edward Egan has expressed concerns about the impact of a proposed air vent (disguised as a building) at 50th Street and Madison Avenue, very near to St. Patrick's Cathedral.

The project was justified by a 1998 study that showed that approximately 70% of all jobs in Midtown Manhattan are within walking distance of Grand Central, while only 36% of jobs are within walking distance of Penn Station (there is some overlap, and some jobs are not within walking distance of either facility).

If the project is completed, Metro-North is considering bringing trains into Penn Station via the West Side Line along Manhattan's west side, which currently handles Amtrak and freight service.  The current MTA Chairman has indicated that his ultimate goals would be for the beginning of the east side assess and the merger of the LIRR and Metro-North.  His apparent rational is that LIRR and Metro-North have many similarities and that "There must be some new efficiencies we can find."  Metro-North enjoys two apparent advantages: 1. it has exclusive access to Grand Central Terminal while the LIRR faces bottlenecks going into a crammed Penn Station with New Jersey Transit and Amtrak.  2. Metro-North has three main lines are unlike LIRR in that LIRR's main lines, except for 1, have to filter through Jamaica.

In addition to this plan, a proposal is on the table to build a new tunnel in the East River to bring LIRR trains downtown to the new World Trade Center Transportation Hub. This plan is on the drawing board and construction has not started.

 

On the road side, nothing of significance except seemingly endless repairs.    There is an idea being developed.  That idea is that on the busiest highways, paying a price to avoid traffic. In other words, tolls.

 

The Air Train - The train to the plane,  an Air Train from LIRR's Jamaica Station to Kennedy Airport- Source: LIRR web site

                    Routes and Stations    AirTrain system and connections map        AirTrain at John F. Kennedy International Airport.

According to the Long Island Rail Road web site, the AirTrain connects the airport terminals and parking areas with Long Island Rail Road and New York City Subway lines at Jamaica and Howard Beach stations in Queens. The system consists of three overlapping routes:
  • Howard Beach route
  • Jamaica Station route
  • Airline Terminal route

The Howard Beach route ends at the Howard Beach-JFK subway station served by the A train. It stops at Lefferts Boulevard for shuttle buses to long term parking lots A and B and to airport employee parking. The Jamaica route ends at Jamaica Station on the Long Island Rail Road, next to the Sutphin Boulevard/Archer Avenue-JFK subway station served by the E, J, and Z trains.

Before separating for their final destinations, both routes stop at Federal Circle for car rental companies and shuttle buses to hotels and the airport's air cargo area. Both routes make a counterclockwise loop through the airport and stop at each terminal.

The Airline Terminal route serves the six terminal stations (Terminal 1, Terminals 2/3, Terminal 4, Terminals 5/6, Terminal 7, and Terminals 8/9), but operates in the opposite direction, making a clockwise loop.

History

Arriving at Federal Circle at JFK Airport.     
Arriving at Federal Circle at JFK Airport.
Two car AirTrain at Federal Circle.
Two car AirTrain at Federal Circle.
 <